Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Ask the Tropers is for:
- General questions about the wiki, how it works, and how to do things.
- Reports of problems with wiki articles, or requests for help with wiki articles.
- Reports of misbehavior or abuse by other tropers.
Ask the Tropers is not for:
- Help identifying a trope. See TropeFinder.
- Help identifying a work. See MediaFinder.
- Asking if a trope example is valid. See the Trope Talk forum.
- Proposing new tropes. See TropeLaunchPad.
- Making bug reports. See QueryBugs.
- Asking for new wiki features. See QueryWishlist.
- Chatting with other tropers. See our forums.
- Reporting problems with advertisements. See this forum topic.
- Reporting issues on the forums. Send a Holler instead.
Ask the Tropers:
openNo Title Film
There's a contested "Funny Aneurysm" Moment example from Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. It was deleted once, then I added it back once with an alternative reasoning than what was reasoned, if you will, by the guy who originally put it in. It got deleted again, so I decided to bring it here for opinions:
- In Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, Bones (DeForest Kelley) tries to chat up Spock (Leonard Nimoy) about the experience of being dead. Spock replies that the conversation wouldn't work because they have no common frame of reference—Bones had never died. Kelley ended up beating Nimoy to our great reward in real life.
Is it really an example on the grounds I suggested? Or does the other guy have a point? I'm not about to engage in any edit warring, since I know what that's been known to cause in the past; rather, I should like to see the question of whether the above is an example on any grounds settled as quickly as possible.
openNo Title Film
Is there a page for the movie "+1" or "Plus One" yet? It's the one where all the college-age people are at a party then because of some sci-fi electrical thing there's a clone of every single one, or like parallel universe selves.
I'm having trouble searching for it cuz its name is weird.
openNo Title Film
Hello, I was wondering if it would be frowned upon to move the first opus of the Spider-Man Trilogy to Film/SpiderMan1, rather than the current Film/SpiderMan (with a custom title still spelling it "Spider-Man").
This would allow the movie to have its own subpages (Awesome, YMMV, Trivia, etc.) disengaged from those of the main Franchise, which can get tedious at time.
Or is it something that the planned overall of the website is going to make obsolete soon, and thus I should not bother yet?
openNo Title Film
I was thinking about adding Borat to the Unfortunate Implications page, but I wanted to know if this article is authentic enough for the information on the criticisms this film had.
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2012/may/17/sacha-baron-cohen-dictator-sterotype
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3309866,00.html
openNo Title Film
Does an official rule exist against adding He Really Can Act entries to movies' YMMV pages? I noticed one disappeared from YMMV.Guardians Of The Galaxy, only to reappear with new wording.
openNo Title Film
I just created Singin' in the Rain and added it to the Headscratchers/Film index, but the index back/forward arrows aren't appearing on the bottom of the page yet. Could someone fix this, please?
openNo Title Film
So the example list for the recent film Interstellar (I know Examples Are Not Recent, but I thought it worth mentioning since the page is probably relatively young as a result) groups Slippy-Slidey Ice World and Roaring Rapids as sub-tropes under a "Planet Tropes" bullet. It's not wicked, nor is it a trope to my knowledge.
So, should I:
- Remove the main bullet and sort the sub-bullets as top-level examples accordingly,
- Change the main bullet to Single-Biome Planet and move it accordingly, or
- Do something else?
EDIT: Also, I'm pretty sure the second bullet is the wrong answer, since you're not supposed to group tropes under Super-Tropes. It screws up the alphabetization.
Edited by SolipSchismopenNo Title Film
mraspiringactor uncommented a bunch of Zero Context Examples on the Ice Age character page.
openNo Title Film
I tried to make a YMMV part of the movie of the "judge" and moved the bit of Dwight being lawful neutral to the YMMV but it didn't work out the way I was accepting(ei:most YMMV are colored grey and the YMMV sign normally shows up on the page itself) also yeah this is the first time I attempted of making a YMMV page(also making my first movie page.)
Anyway yeah the question could you guys please help me out with making the YMMV page?
Edited by tvglaxopenNo Title Film
Considering how disappointed some feel with news like Edgar Wright not directing Ant-Man anymore, and/or Captain America 3 adapting a polarizing comic storyline, does it seem like time to reword the introduction of AndTheFandomRejoiced.Marvel Cinematic Universe?
openNo Title Film
ExtrovertFederalist
uncommented some ZC Es on the 12 Angry Men
page. I've already warned him about it before, and figured the message went through when he added information to the two context-less examples he put up. Apparently not.
openNo Title Film
For the record, does an official rule advise against keeping And the Fandom Rejoiced pages clean of news that caused a Broken Base? I noticed AndTheFandomRejoiced.New Media has a warning not to list the end of Demo Reel for this reason, but AndTheFandomRejoiced.Marvel Cinematic Universe lists a number of events that might not please all fans (eg, the revelation of a third Mandarin, the news of a Civil War adaptation).
Edited by dsneybufopenNo Title Film
deathmaster87 appears to be running with that inane cloud-to-butt text filter. I've cleaned up its effects on H.E.R., but I haven't had an opportunity to examine his editing history, yet. At the very least, he had it active three days ago when editing that page.
ETA: I just skimmed through the past year's (or so) worth of edits, and I'm not seeing any other instances of the filter at work. No further cleanup should be necessary, other than making sure he disables the plug-in while editing.
Edited by BakaToTheFutureopenNo Title Film
Could someone please help me find the discussion that led to Wreck It Ralph getting its own And the Fandom Rejoiced page, if such a discussion exists?
openNo Title Film
Okay, I'm just gonna ask, I've been looking at Film A To M and I came across this... is this a good entry for Wallbangers or does it just come off as complaining?
"Maleficent oh dear god Maleficent, so The self proclaimed "Mistress of All Evil" and who commands all The Power of Hell turns out to not be all that bad and is actually good? And The Fairies are incompetent morons who endanger Aurora instead of being the loving and doteful caretakers? I'm gonna need an Aspirin the size of her Dragon Form to get over this headache. Walt Disney is rolling in his Grave."
I feel like it's the latter.
Edited by Psyga315

There's apparently a film called Crossing Over, but while it doesn't have a work page here, there is an Awesome.Crossing Over. Shouldn't that one entry just be moved to the Awesome.Other Film page and then cutlist ACO, or is there a reason to keep a "rootless" subpage with only one entry?
Edited by Nohbody