Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Ask the Tropers is for:
- General questions about the wiki, how it works, and how to do things.
- Reports of problems with wiki articles, or requests for help with wiki articles.
- Reports of misbehavior or abuse by other tropers.
Ask the Tropers is not for:
- Help identifying a trope. See TropeFinder.
- Help identifying a work. See MediaFinder.
- Asking if a trope example is valid. See the Trope Talk forum.
- Proposing new tropes. See TropeLaunchPad.
- Making bug reports. See QueryBugs.
- Asking for new wiki features. See QueryWishlist.
- Chatting with other tropers. See our forums.
- Reporting problems with advertisements. See this forum topic.
- Reporting issues on the forums. Send a Holler instead.
Ask the Tropers:
openNo Title Film
Would anyone mind if I move some entries on Fridge.Guardians Of The Galaxy about the Awesome Mix to the currently-shrimpy AwesomeMusic.Guardians Of The Galaxy page?
openNo Title Film
Didn't bother clicking the link, but I'm assuming this is spam: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Film.AvengersAgeOfUltron&id=92984#92984
openNo Title Film
Film.Agent For HARM lists both of the following tropes:
- Bittersweet Ending: Adam manages to prevent the villain from dusting American crops with the poisonous spores, thereby saving millions of lives, but that's about all that goes right. He fails to find an antidote to the spore and fails to protect Stefanik, the only scientist in the world who is even close to developing an antidote. He also fails to notice that Ava is The Mole, despite her being really bad at it. He doesn't even manage to take the villain down properly; the critically wounded Stefanik is the one who kills the villain, getting himself dusted with spores in the process.
- Downer Ending: The Doctor is killed by the spore despite claiming he gave himself the antidote, and Adam makes out with Ava while arresting her of a capital crime. It's hard to feel anything happy at the end, not even a Bittersweet Ending.
Aren't these mutually exclusive? Should one of these be removed?
EDIT: I think the problem is that on a personal level it is totally a downer ending. Sure the good guy wins and saves millions of lives, but A Million Is a Statistic, and in the process the only likeable character in the movie dies and the cute girl is exposed as a villain and arrested. I think what needs to be done is Downer Ending should be removed, and Bittersweet Ending should be altered to reflect how bad the ending really is.
Edited by wrm5openNo Title Film
So Moulin Rouge! appears to be hosting information on two movies that are completely unrelated except for their titles and the fact that they take place in and/or are about the same theatre, the Moulin Rouge. Am I mistaken? Can this page be split? This doesn't look like a film and its remake, this looks like two different, unrelated films.
Edited by SolipSchismopenNo Title Film
Mdumas43073 moved a lot of the articles listed on Creator.Shout Factory down to the "Scream Factory" section, even though Shout! didn't release them through that label. Could someone please revert this?
openNo Title Film
So, on May 24th, 2013 user notahandle blanked the page Funny.Invasion Of The Neptune Men. I get WHY it was blanked - the only examples it listed were actually from the Mystery Science Theater 3000 episode devoted to the movie, and not the movie itself. But the thing is, now the page is just sitting there, empty.
What should be done about this? Should I Cut List the page? Leave it? What?
openNo Title Film
In The Waterboy, Bobby Boucher refers to his job of waterboy as "Water distribution engineer." Does this qualify as Sesquipedalian Loquaciousness?
openNo Title Film
In the X-Men films, Wolverine is clearly portrayed as a protagonist, but he can be, in a word, an asshole, and tends not to care about being a jerk to almost everyone around him. He tells a young girl (Rogue) to get out of his truck where she was hiding because she had no other means of transportation, having run away from home (keep in mind they're in Canada, it's snowing, and she doesn't have winter clothes). He tells her he doesn't know where she's supposed to go, and when asked if he doesn't know or doesn't care, he impatiently and abrasively replies "Pick one!"
He also tells Magneto and Professor X to "Go fuck [themselves]" when they approach him in a bar and introduce themselves like gentlemen, without antagonizing him at all.
This is justified though, since he's spent over 100 years on the run from people who want to kill or capture him, and has learned not to trust anyone.
Does this make him a Jerkass Woobie?
openNo Title Film
Uh, what's with the image on this page? Of course, ignoring that Examples Are Not Recent in the description and a good chunk of the tropes are Zero Context Examples.
Edited by valozzyopenNo Title Film
In the film Lucy, the title character is shown to have an substantial appetite after unlocking 20% of her brain's capacity. The movie never outright states it, but this presumably relates to the fact that humans need large amounts of food because of our abnormally large brains. Lucy is using twice as much brain power as the average human, so she would, in theory, need even more sustenance to feed her brain.
Does this qualify as fridge brilliance?
Edited by RayAP9openNo Title Film
Are there certain events in a given work that are technically spoilers, but don't really have to be tagged as such on the wiki?
For example, Captain America: The Winter Soldier. The fact that The Winter Soldier is Bucky Barnes. His actor is listed as Sebastian Stan (and was before the movie hit theaters), and anyone who's even semi-interested in Captain America comics probably knows this. Anyone who's looking up the film on here and reading the different pages (WMG, Headscratchers, Fridge, etc.) probably falls into one of the aforementioned groups or has simply seen the movie already. This "spoiler" in particular could almost be the codifier for It Was His Sled.
Do we really have to even bother with tagging things like this as spoilers?
Edited by RayAP9openNo Title Film
Is there a guideline on when, or if, to make new pages for works of literature? Many times, I see work pages under the Theatre or Film namespace even if the adaptation is better known than the source material. I would bet a lot more people have seen the film version of Harvey, but it's under the Theatre namespace.
But other times you see separate pages created for works. I saw that a separate page was made for the Paul Thomas Anderson film of Inherent Vice, even though it, as I understand, is a highly faithful adaptation.
Original namespace? Separate namespace? Up to the individual?
Edited by galliumopenNo Title Film
Should I add a commented out message at the start of Guardians of the Galaxy reminding tropers to refrain from adding potholes to quotes? I removed them in two edits but now another troper is not only adding a new quote with potholes but also covering it all in a spoiler mark.
openNo Title Film
Where do you report a work page that has obvious problems, but you don't know enough about the work to fix some of them or fill them out? (And I have a doctor's appt today, and I refuse to edit from my phone. Regular forum posting is hard enough.)
Film.Two Thousand One A Space Odyssey. I was just scanning the page looking to see if it had a trope someone asked about on Trope Finder. It doesn't seem to, but man, does that page have problems.
Edited by CandiopenNo Title Film
Why does the note in Girl-Show Ghetto next to the entry in the Live Action Film folder about the Hunger Games movies stay open?
openNo Title Film
So I just heard that Ron the Death Eater now requires citations, like Unfortunate Implications (which is still the face of TV Tropes citations to this day, as far as I'm aware). Why's that? And having previously added an example to Frozen Disney upon witnessing certain events here involving the demonization of the character listed in said example (before I had heard about the new citations requirement, mind you), I feel obliged to ask, would a citation from here regarding those events be considered valid? Or would I be better served to look elsewhere for citations?
openNo Title Film
At least two examples on Beauty And The Beast which I'm unsure how they're played:
- Evil Plan: Double Subverted. Gaston's initial plan to make the most beautiful girl in town, I.E. Belle, his Housewife isn't really diabolical. It's the plan that involves unjustly locking a man away just so he can achieve his goal that is evil.
- Fourth-Date Marriage: An interesting aversion. The seasons change throughout the film, leaving the time Belle spends in the castle with the Beast indeterminable from weeks to months prior to their marriage. In addition, it is not shown that they actually married during the film, although it is heavily implied that they did some time after.

I have a new work to use as an example for different trope pages, but I don't know where to put it on the pages. Some of the pages aren't alphabetical, so where do put it? At top, at the bottom, oldest film to newest?