Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Ask the Tropers is for:
- General questions about the wiki, how it works, and how to do things.
- Reports of problems with wiki articles, or requests for help with wiki articles.
- Reports of misbehavior or abuse by other tropers.
Ask the Tropers is not for:
- Help identifying a trope. See TropeFinder.
- Help identifying a work. See MediaFinder.
- Asking if a trope example is valid. See the Trope Talk forum.
- Proposing new tropes. See TropeLaunchPad.
- Making bug reports. See QueryBugs.
- Asking for new wiki features. See QueryWishlist.
- Chatting with other tropers. See our forums.
- Reporting problems with advertisements. See this forum topic.
- Reporting issues on the forums. Send a Holler instead.
Ask the Tropers:
open Edit war report (including self-report).
First of all, sorry for accidentally contributing to edit war. I'll try not to repeat it again. Second, there was an edit war on Trivia.Freedom Planet 2, regarding a user adding complainy natter.
- A user called jerkwad152 added this
complainy natter edit as a sub-bullet to Development Hell at November 25th of 2021, the statement being a response to the comment's finalized date being "So far, anyway. There have been a number of "final" dates.", obviously insulting the developers for not meeting their deadlines in the past.
- It was removed by Mister Tambourine Man on February 3rd of this year with an edit reason "This isn't a message board".
- jerkwad152 re-added the edit with a rude edit reason of "Rent-a-modding not needed".
- Mister Tambourine Man re-removed it again, given edit reason being "This is a wiki page, not a message board."
- jerkwad152 re-re-adds the nattery edit with "No one is using the wiki as a message board. It's an objectively true statement. Continued misuse of the edit function simply because you disagree will result in the involvement of site staff." as an edit reason.
- And then I removed it again (sorry about contributing to edit war, by the way. It won't happen again).
Anyways, we have an issue with a user being defensive of their complainy and nattery edit. I'd ask we keep an eye on the page just in case.
openIs it alright to discard someone else's draft?
So there's a TLP draft
that's been gathering bombs as its a stub and already covered by The Napoleon. It now has 11 bombs (including one from myself) and I feel that it's enough as IMO it's clear that it needs to be discarded. However am I allowed to do that or only the sponsor and mods are allowed to discard drafts?
EDIT: Whelp, the draft got discarded but I still would like to know just in case.
Edited by Cutegirl920fireresolved Fanfic Recs self removal
On FanficRecs.Total Drama, one poster removed the recommendations they previously made for fics due to issues they have with the original work’s production company. Is this allowed?
open Miraheze wikis
I've been looking at Miraheze wikis for a while and been wondering:
https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Terrible_Shows_%26_Episodes_Wiki
https://besttvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Best_Shows_%26_Episodes_Wiki
Are Miraheze wikis good sites to build your examples off of? I looked on Deviant Art yesterday and quite a few posts are condemning them. I myself am beginning to doubt their reliability.
openExample needs expansion
From the Real Life section of Shocking Defeat Legacy:
"The Mongols have done this a lot to others: they conquered China, decimated Persia, ravaged Russia, and nearly conquered Europe. For Russians especially, the Mongol attack on Kievan Rus' is cited as one of the major reasons for why Russians are backward compared to Europe."
This needs expanding, because (opinions of Russia right now to one side) it sounds like cultural posturing. This should be expanded to explain how they are "backward" from a purely objective viewpoint. Technology? Culture? Economy? What is it?
I am not an expert on this, so I can't flesh this out myself. Should it be commented out until someone with more knowledge can fix it?
openCan Mewtwo have Hartman Hips? Asking for someone else.
All the way back in 2014, I pulled an example on Hartman Hips that listed Mewtwo (the genderless, barely-humanoid pokemon). It read as follows.
Mewtwo, despite being classified as genderless and leaning on the masculine side, has pretty big hips while having a small waist and shoulder line.
I just got an inquiry from a troper named Gamer Boy 18 that asked me how it isn't a valid example.
I don't like it when someone sets themself up as the curator of a particular trope, so rather than answer with authority I'm posting it here.
My logic is that since Hartman Hips is about a particular style of drawing female characters and it isn't female, it's not valid.
(Also, it's rather strange that I got an inquiry about an edit I made back in 2014 when the subject hasn't been brought up since then)
openEdit War Over Misused Trope
(Spoilers for Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Trials and Tribulations.)
The other day, Irodion added an entry
to Characters.Ace Attorney Dahlia Hawthorne which misused Ain't Too Proud to Beg. This is because, as stated on its main page, it applies to a hero and not a villain while Dahlia is the latter. Therefore, I removed it
and explained that in my edit reason. However, they later brought it back
anyway.
Can I have permission to remove this entry? If someone wants to do it yourself, you're free to, though I'd link this post somewhere in your edit reason.
openPro-Heard edit
- Johnny Depp was fired from the Fantastic Beasts series in the middle of production of the then-upcoming third film when he lost a libel case against a tabloid in the UK in November 2020. The tabloid had run a headline calling him a "wife beater" in the context of talking about him remaining in the series despite allegations of domestic violence against him by ex-wife, Amber Heard.note He was cast sometime in 2015 for the first film in the series but his role (which in that film was really just a glorified cameo) was kept secret until the film came out in November 2016, by which time Heard had filed for divorce and been granted a restraining order. The judge in the lawsuit ruled in favor of the tabloid, saying the tabloid's (and, by extension, Heard's) allegations were "substantially true", with twelve of fourteen instances used by the defense meeting the civil standard for domestic violence. Supposedly, WB had done its own investigation into the situation that came to a similar conclusion as the court case and had just been waiting for some sort of legally binding ruling to cut him loose.note A case in the US directly against Heard, in which Depp alleges that he had been defamed and that damages have occurred as a result of an op-ed that Heard had posted in the Washington Post in 2018, had its trial by jury commence in April 2022 (Same month as the film's release). Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen was very quickly cast to take over the role. Depp later won a defamation suit against Heard had better luck in 2022.the trial in the US but an inconsistent ruling by jury note They found she defamed him with the allegations but also she was defamed herself by his lawyer when he called her allegations a hoax on top of serious questions about the fairness and venue of the Commonwealth of Virginia for the trial did little more than kicked it up to the appeals level.
queenhippolytas
accuses the verdict of being inconsistent, despite the fact that due to the trial being a suit/countersuit it's perfectly possible both parties could be defamers. This also ignores the context behind Amber's win, Depp's former attorney made a highly specific allegation that was hard to prove.
openAvoiding an Edit War
Reposting
a couple things
(though it's not exactly the same).
The other day, someone added
a "[sic]" next to each "Hearths" in Characters.Friendship Is Failure. While I think using "[sic]" itself is fine, I want to remove it in this case because it isn't a spelling mistake. Also, I checked and "hearths"
isn't an obscure term. It's additionally used
on The Other Wiki. Additionally, I posted this on a cleanup thread. However, nobody answered my question. Would it be ok if I remove them?
I would do it myself, however, I want to avoid an Edit War because the troper in question brought them back
after I deleted them
.
open Can non-monolithic supranational polities count as Space-Filling Empires?
Would Space-Filling Empire apply to a world whose political geography is dominated by supranational unions and superstates that lack the monolithicity that is typical to said trope? I will use the Front Mission setting as an example to illustrate.
- The Oceania Cooperative Union (OCU) evolved from the real-life ASEAN, and comprises Southeast Asia, Australia, Japan and various island countries in the Pacific Ocean.
- The United States of the New Continent (USN) encompasses all of the Americas.
- The European Community (EC) is a federalized evolution of the European Union.note No, I don't know why it uses the name of the EU's even less centralized predecessor. Your guess is as good as mine.
- The Organization of African Consolidation (OAC) is nominally a successor to the African Union, but it excludes the northeastern corner of the continent (Egyptnote Which is marked on one official map of Africa as part of a region that has the text "Afro-Arab Union(?)" on it, but see later., Sudannote including South Sudan, since earlier games predate its secession, and Libya).
- The Republic of Zaftra is a result of the Commonwealth of Independent States' members merging into a single superstate, with the exception of Belarus (canon contradicts itself on whether it refused outright or seceded later), renaming itself "Ranvui".
- The People's Republic of Da Han Zhong (DHZ) is a rebranding of the real-life People's Republic of China, which managed to annex Taiwan.
One source book also adds the "Non-Aligned Territories", which includes the entirety of the Middle East and India. That being said, these supranational polities are not quite monolithic like your typical Space-Filling Empire; the OCU in particular features several of its member states' governments being shown as having their own, sometimes clashing interests, and the EC's own members are treated by the narrative as distinct political entities with their own military forces, though both are ultimately subordinate to the EC's central government and military command (with the exception of certain paramilitary groups that are formally not part of the national militaries, such as Britain's Durandal and Germany's Blauer Nebel).
They also suffer from considerable nationalistic unrest; the USN has to fight rebellions in South America that are driven by the North-South wealth inequality (the one in Venezuela is a major plot driver in the USN side of the story mode in Front Mission 4), the DHZ has to contend with pro-Taiwanese independence militants, the OCU struggles to suppress multiple independence movements among its members, and Zaftra eventually falls into a messy civil war.
So with that in mind, does the setting of Front Mission and others like it qualify for Space-Filling Empire, even if only as a subversion or deconstruction?
Edited by MarqFJAopenWhat do I move Creator.{{Aja}} to?
What do I move Creator.Aja to? She's a Actress, but also a Rapper, apparently, so I was going to move her to Creator.Aja Rapper...
But rappers are Music, so shouldn't it be Music.Aja Rapper then I turn Music.Aja into a disambig?
Or some other name, still in the Creator namespace and Creator.Aja becomes a disambig between the current and Aja Naomi King?
At least the itself is real easy:
Moved from Creator.{{Aja}}, all content by Tropers/{{tropermorgan1234}}
Edited by Malady
openLinking to trope subpages outside of their articles
Stupid question probably, but occasionally I see potholes to subpages of tropes on articles instead of the trope itself, e.g. “Trope/RealLife” instead of “Trope”.
I’m assuming potholes like this aren’t allowed? Just wanted to ask to be certain.
open potential Edit War with Bense in the Hobbit Literature
This other troper and I have been arguing. We can't agree on anything. The problem is that I am willing to keep entries on our debate neutral, and he keeps asserting his point of view as fact. The problem is that his views I just cannot bring myself to leave them be. They simply clash with all my interpretations of the book and I feel a little sick looking at what he treats as fact, since in order to be at peace with it I'd have to change my very moral compass, and I can't just do that on short notice!
openEdit War on ''No Exit''
Stanisz added a bunch of examples to No Exit, with spoiler tags. When somebody adjusted the spoiler tags, Stanisz added the spoiler tags right back, with the text "Fixing your "fixing" of spoiler tags. The fact that [...] doesn't even get obvious for a quite a while, and way to spoil [CHARACTER NAME]'s involvement"
(As you can tell, I removed spoilery information from that quote, since I assume some of you have yet to see the movie.)
Since it's hard to tell what changes were made twice by Stanisz, let me point it out:
- Character names were absent from the below quote. When they were added, as is proper, Stanisz removed them again. (Would have been better to just spoiler them out, if you ask yours truly.)
- Stupid is getting yourself killed for a stranger.- I'm a Marine, you idiot. It's what we do.
- The two final words in They Look Like Everyone Else were spoiler-tagged again.
- Stanisz removed the commenting-out from Crucified Hero Shot after adding that zero-context example originally, but didn't add any info as he removed the commenting-out.
- One paragraph starts with "Darby is a drug addicted no-gooder..." The spoiler-tags at the end of that paragraph were re-added.
EDIT: I forgot to mention, Stanisz also has some grammar trouble. There's article problems, forgetting "a" and "the", though I talked to him about that already, and sentences like "Ochucki starts at one point chewing Hochwander over his Stealing from the Till..."
Edited by MichaelKatsuroopenUsed Future clarification Literature
I need someone to attest if this trope even applies to given situation:
In Missile Gap
, the US government has its resources stretched to a near-breaking point. Most of the equipment, vehicles and what not that is available for civilians comes from the 50s, while the story is set in the 80s (or at the very least tail end of the 70s). And here comes my issue. It isn't exactly "future", at least in a clear, obvious way. However, the story is a serious Mind Screw
- by default, it is a far future, since the whole story is set millions of years in the future, with all characters and the world itself being just a snapshop (probably) of Earth in the wake of the Cuban Crisis and the consequences of that event in the new place; more importantly, characters in-universe are aware of this
- the story itself heavily employs the used gear aesthetics, especially since from in-universe perspective, characters expect new gizmos and design, rather than being reduced to reusing what should be send to a scrapyard decades ago
So... does Used Future work, or there should be other trope used to cover this?
Edited by StaniszopenNattery additions
maxreid had added natter to one of their own examples in Absurdly Spacious Sewer. I sent them a PM over it and then removed the natter (while fixing many other issues in that page). Shortly afterwards, maxreid added another piece of natter in their next edit. I think that one can be salvaged by simply merging it with the example it's put under, but honestly I don't feel like doing it myself. Mostly because maxreid clearly doesn't take the hint, and sending them another PM feels like talking to a wall by this point.
openEdit War alert
Hours ago
, Crazy Luigi added lone three bullets entry to the part about Blizzcon 2018 in Presentations folder of Horrible.Video Games Other.
I sent them the indentation notifier and remove the entry since it's about the game itself, not the Blizzcon (said so in edit reason). They put it back
, at least without wrong indentaion this time.
openWhen's a proper time to start sorting pages into alphabetized folders and/or their own sections?
I know there's a whole process for characters, but I mean if a work itself needs a section dedicated to an #-M, then N-Z on tropes. Of course sometimes they get so big you have to start sorting by individual letter.
open Questionable edit and edit war
On July 4th, 2019
, the troper wrpen99 added Ambiguous Gender Identity as a sub-trope of Artistic License – Biology — this was their only edit at the time, and they provided no edit reason. On September 20th of the same year
, Nubian Satyress deleted this addition. On August 2nd 2021
, wrpen99 re-added it, again their only edit, again no edit reason. 21 days later
, Rena Starfall deleted it. On the 5th of this month
, wrpen99 re-added Ambiguous Gender Identity to the page, again their only edit, again no edit reason.
Now, I see no possible reason why Ambiguous Gender Identity would qualify as Artistic License – Biology. The trope doesn't in any way mention gender identity in relation to biology, only in strictly psychological terms, and the trope itself isn't unrealistic. However, even aside what I see as a persistent agenda on the part of wrpen99, they have undeniably been waging an edit war. I'd like to remove their addition after their suspension, and I'd like a consensus for or against such a decision.

There are several entries I made that were modified in ways that I think have issues. Want to check if it's edit warring or not to modify as opposed to reverting entries, and to run them by here first.
Was changed to:
Uncertain Audience:
Was changed to:
Pokémon:
Was changed to:
Permission to make my proposed modifications?
Edited by Ferot_Dreadnaught