Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
This aint good. Good Call coming here!
Discord: Waido X 255#1372 If you cant contact me on TV Tropes do it here.
Hmmm...wasn't there another Anti-Dany troper causing trouble not too long ago?
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
^ Yes. Team Tony was an Anti-Dany troper and was permanently suspended for attempting ban evasion. She also defended Sansa in some of her edits and edit reasons. I don't think this pattern is a coincidence.
Edited by Kevjro7
Can we agree to remove the quoted entry?
I agree. The basic idea is fine (Sansa endures all this crap and ends up queen) but the way its written is not proper.
Muramasa got.
I'm not sure if this counts as rudeness or otherwise problematic, so I'm bringing this up here. cheedo has edited some pages for the Game of Thrones / A Song Of Ice and Fire series, and I think they might be a little defensive of Sansa. While some of there edits are perfectly fine, sometimes just snipping out unnecessary negativity about Sansa, others seem a little too...much?
On this
Awesome Moments page, cheedo deletes Missandei defending Daenerys from Sansa. Though the original entry again has some unnecessary bitterness, I question just deleting the entry entirely. They added this entry to the page:
Which is This Troper and meta regardless. This
page has the deletion Jerkass Realization about Sansa siding with Joffrey about Lady attacking him and apologizing to Jon for being a jerk to him growing up. It's pretty universally agreed that sympathetic though she is, Sansa is in the wrong in these situations. They edited Loving a Shadow, which is fair, but with this edit reason: "Nice victim blaming. Joffrey was going to abuse Sansa if she ever angered him, which Arya was too painfully naive to understand. Sansa didn't "side" with either of them. Not to mention, Arya wasn't exactly a great sister to Sansa. Nor do we ever see evidence that Jon and Sansa had a bad relationship."
Just...I'm not sure if this is too defensive or not, absolving Sansa of all accountability in these situations. Also, this was before everyone knew Joffrey was an abusive monster, so calling Arya "painfully naive" (and "not exactly a great sister to Sansa") seems like diverting negativity from one character to another. Can I get some feedback?
Edited by iamconstantine