Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I mean, I guess I'm not convinced that it IS an unfair exaggeration? Sure, it would be unfair to characterize every single Federation citizen or member world without exception as irredeemably racist, but the fact remains that, as an organization, it denied aid to a people facing an existential threat for racist reasons, and the way the first example is worded ties itself into rhetorical knots to try to excuse that. Like, fourteen member worlds threatened to secede because they didn't want to render aid to a historical enemy, and the rest of the Federation ultimately bowed to that pressure... and that's why they're NOT racist? What?
Edited by HighCrateHaving not watched it yet— I understand High Crate's example better. It shows a cause and effect for the reputation among some fans instead of immediately arguing that it's unfair or mistaken to think that way. I don't know what the Mars situation is; it muddles the example for me. If it's actually important context, that isn't clear.
Edited by immichan^^ I proposed it be put under Never Live It Down as it seemed the best fit for the issue here
. If it was not an unfair exaggeration(which given the series was bound around Picard resigning over this it was meant to be a big a deal), it's wrong to put it under that trope.
Broken Base may be the best trope once the waiting period is up.
Should the NILD be cut as misuse/being contested?
Edited by Ferot_DreadnaughtThe Federation where being labeled racist for not putting in resources to save as many Romulans as possible. As their racism to the Romulans lead to their inaction. I can see the issue with that. 1- The Federation not acting was due to a series of unfortunate prior events including the Mars attacks and threats from other worlds seceding if they added the Romulans due to their past actions as an enemy making it a lose lose situation. Lose the moral ground or lose the support of important members when the Federation needed it most and 2- The Federation Worlds hesitation and reluctance to help the Romulans were not because they where Romulans . But because they had been a cold war and sometimes just plain war enemy for centuries and sacrificing resources to aid sometime enemy and expansionist Empire would cost more then they would gain, in short pragmatism.
Edited by TuvokYes that was a bit jumbled wasn't it.
1) The Federation had to weigh losing important Federation membership worlds weakening them in a time of crisis and uncertainty. Choosing the unethical over the ethical.
2) Its was not because they hated the Romulans as a people. But the Romulan Empire and its history of conquest and the bloody history involved. The history with the Romulan empire and the strained and sometimes blood soaked relationship with the Federation made making an effort and the costs involved pragmatically impossible. Especially when the cost to the Federation outweighed the gain. It was not hate of the Romulan people themselves, but the history of the Romulan Empire with the rest of the Federation. It wasn't Racism it was history mixed with politics and bad timing.
Edited by Tuvok^The 14 world threatening succession over it were racist, but if the Federation gave in to their demands out of racism or being held hostage by that they couldn't afford to lose them given the exceptional, desperate circumstances remans debated in-and-out of work.
Were there any other options the Federation could have taken?
Sounds like Alternate Character Interpretation is the trope this issue goes under (this is even debated in-work). How's this:
- Alternate Character Interpretation: Was the Federation abandoning aid to the Romulans done purely out of racism, justifiable distrust given their centuries of antagonism and fleeting at best alliances, or could they legitimately not afford the resources and political fallout of aiding them after the Federation suffered devastating attacks? Were the attacks just an excuse to avoid the racists protest of aiding them, or would they have aided despite their protests if not for the exceptional and dire circumstances the attack left them in?
Should I replace the NILD with this? Anything to add/modify?
Edited by Ferot_DreadnaughtSome typos that need fixing:
- "Was it racism that cause the fourteen worlds to threaten secession if the Federation aided the Romulan or the Federation to capitulate to said worlds or justifiable protest/distrust" => "Was it racism that caused the fourteen worlds to threaten secession if the Federation aided the Romulan and the Federation to capitulate to said worlds, or justifiable protest/distrust"
- "the Romulans sordid history" => "the Romulans' sordid history"
- "Would the Federation have added them" => "Would the Federation have aided them"
- "could they not legitimately not afford the resources" => "could they legitimately not afford the resources"
Might be more that I missed.
I changed the entry as the 14 worlds protesting aiding the Romulan was racism, regardless of the reasons. The question remains about the Federation going along with them and why.
- Alternate Character Interpretation: Was the Federation abandoning aid to the Romulans done purely out of racism, justifiable distrust given their centuries of antagonism and fleeting at best alliances, or could they legitimately not afford the resources and political fallout of aiding them after the Federation suffered devastating attacks? Were the attacks just an excuse to avoid the racists protest of aiding them, or would they have aided them despite their protests if not for the exceptional and dire circumstances the attack left them in?
Anything to add/modify?

Per proir ATT
, I added this to YMMV.Star Trek Picard:
Afterwards, HighCrate changed it to this:
This removes the explanation for why it is an unfair exaggeration which prior cleanup deemed a requirement for all NILD examples. HighCrate is active on other cleanup threads and was involved in said prior ATT, so I think we should give them the benefit of the doubt over this. But why the change? Is there something I missed? I've invited them here to discuss this.
I'd ask NILD cleanup but it seems inactive at the moment given my last inquiry there has yet to be responded to.
Edited by Ferot_Dreadnaught