TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

AegisP Since: Oct, 2014
2020-03-13 11:13:17

On one hand I do agree with you but on the other that is very much a list of mistakes begginers make... that you can pull off once you are more experienced. That list is very much a list of stuff that isnt 255% bad writing.

As long as this flower is in my heart. My Strength will flow without end.
WaterBlap Since: May, 2014
2020-03-13 12:30:04

Personally I think this discussion has been dragged out long enough and stretched out to too many different places. For example, nobody responded to my proposal for the description in the improvement drive (post here) and there still needs to be a discussion on the tropes in the list.

Should we consolidate this discussion to a short-term project thread? I realize splitting the discussion can harm effective progress but the conversation is currently split and I think a unified thread is in order.


Some criteria I generally agree on in favor of including a trope to this list:

  • The trope must be about writing. This could include characterization, plotting, exposition, dialog. Thus, tropes specifically regarding design, art, or acting are (or should be) excluded.
  • Whether or not there is an Unreliable Narrator in play, there is no good reason to play the given trope — where a "good reason" is something like "produces drama," "produces humor," "marks something about the character/situation," or something similar.
  • The trope is not generally (or specifically) used intentionally to be bad. The status of "bad" or "mark of bad writing" is accidental, generally.

So, I think Dull Surprise should be excluded. For one thing, it generally regards art or acting, how the characters look. When it concerns description of characters, such as in literature or other texts, the description would mark something off about the character or situation. It would tell the audience important information about who is experiencing the Dull Surprise and/or who is describing the Dull Surprise. Thus, not necessarily "bad writing."

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
2020-03-14 02:19:48

Let's consolidate this on the discussion page, to begin.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
WaterBlap Since: May, 2014
2020-03-14 14:04:04

Following up (given Septimus's comment): I have started a discussion on the discussion page. Courtesy link.

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Top