Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
That description sounds pretty conclusive that "a new threat appears after the original happy ending" is absolutely not Happy Ending Override. I flat-out don't understand the argument apparently being made that it would be.
Edited by nrjxllAccording to PlayingWith.Happy Ending Override, this concept actually would be under "downplayed"... but it honestly just sounds like a separate but related trope to me.
Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢Honestly if it did count that could turn literally almost every sequel or spinoff ever into the trope.
My understanding of the trope is that it applies if the override happens offscreen between installments, meaning we come into the sequel and everything is already shot to hell, or, going by since of the examples on the page, if it's literally the first thing that comes as soon as the story starts. Essentially, we the viewers never get to really see the happy ending.
Neither of those apply here,I think, as the ads thus far suggest setup of what the peace is like before the new baddie comes along.
Edited by sgamer82IMO "An installment of a series ends with an enemy being defeated, but the next installment introduces a new enemy to defeat" is so universal it's People Sit on Chairs. Conflict is necessary for a story to be a story, so if you want to continue a story past the point where the antagonist was defeated, you need to introduce a new antagonist.
Edited by phalanxThe following is just my 2 cents, but I think Happy Ending Override should require a specific retcon due to the next or later entry undoing a happy ending that was previously declared canon.
Let's say for example some heroes just defeated the big bad's plan of dropping a space colony on Earth. They do this by blowing up the space colony completely. The ending then consists of the bad guy meeting his end and the world lives peacefully from now on which is declared the canon ending.
Then the next story comes out that undoes the canon ending. The space colony actually crashed on Earth, the bad guy nearly wins by causing a near extinction of Earth's races, and our heroes are licking their wounds as the future looks bleak after barely avoiding annihilation.
Does this make sense? If not, the Happy Ending Override matter might need TRS treatment.
Edited by Ngamer01Here's a good example of Happy Ending Override:
In Final Fantasy XIII, the protagonist, Lightning, accomplishes her goal, that being to save her sister. The two reunite and the game ends on a high note. In XIII-2, it's revealed that immediately after reuniting, Lightning disappeared via Cosmic Retcon and everybody thinks she's dead. XIII's happy ending was literally overwritten.
Edited by PrimisHappy Ending Override should only apply to sequels that specifically undo the victory of the earlier instalment, not ones which create a new conflict/villain/threat. Whether it happens on or off screen does not matter, as I see it. (If it st
But there is inevitable ambiguity in cases like FF XIII-2 where whatever the hero was protecting is taken away by a new enemy. Or when the goal was very broad ("No more war!").
Stories don't tell us monsters exist; we knew that already. They show us that monsters can be trademarked and milked for years.

I made a Trope Finder thread
asking about a trope regarding the heroes earning their happy ending, only for some new threat to come along threatening to destroy everything they worked so hard for that they once again take up arms and combat it. partner555 suggested Happy Ending Override, to which I explained that was only for sequels where it happened inbetween instalments where the heroes fallied, and Tropers/{{4tell0life4}} doubled down on it being Happy Ending Override in conjunction with Immediate Sequel. Happy Ending Override describes itself as the following, emphasis mine:
My query is about works whose sequels, continuations, what-have-you start off in the peace the previous work ended at, and it is in this work that the new threat comes in and tries to ruin it. I feel there's some sort of miscommunication going on, and how both of them seem so sure it's Happy Ending Override makes me wonder how the trope is being used off-page.
Edited by Crossover-Enthusiast