Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I think their edit reason is supposed to be parsed as "can you prove [character] is not [a complete monster]?"
Still demonstrates a lack of awareness for protocol. Edited by crazysamaritan Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Bonus points for misunderstanding burden of proof: They're expecting people to prove them wrong (prove a negative) when they should be trying to prove themselves right.
Current Project: The TeamIf that's not enough, their other edits to that page show an almost complete lack of awareness of the rules for Example Indentation in Trope Lists; I see multiple instances of adding a single second-level bullet below a first-level bullet in the same edit.
Bump
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."bump again.
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."They've been suspended.
Alright the troper Damolisher has been Edit Warring over an unapproved Complete Monster entry they added on Shortland Street. It was removed since it hadn't been brought to and vetted by the thread. Only for him to add it back with the weird edit reason of asking to prove it hadn't come to the thread....when people from the thread were the people who deleted it for being unapproved in the first place(??).
Edit history.
Edited by miraculous