Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
The page description does not say that it has to be In-Universe; and, to me, requiring it to be so sounds counter to what Word of God is supposed to be about.
Edited by homogenizedFrom the Word of God trope description page (emphasis mine):
"A number of people reject the notion of Word of God being equal to canon, considering something to be canon only if it appeared in the original source material. If the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, the thinking goes, they should have included it in the work to begin with."
So the "thing that is stated" doesn't have to be seen/shown in the work itself (happen In Universe). If it is, it's just "Now Has Become Canon" (which probably is another Trope or Trivia, don't know which one).
So Word of God usually refers to statements creators make in Real Life about their works. Usually in interviews they give, or on their social media accounts.
"Stuff that happened in the work" is continuity.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I believe OP is talking about the difference between the Creator making a statement about something In-Universe (Belkar is CE) and making a statement about something Out-of-Universe (Comics will be delayed because my thumb was cut and I need stitches).
As I understand it, both are Word of God because it is a statement outside of the work, whether that statement is about something that should be in the work or something about producing the work.
I'm pretty sure that OP understands WOG is from interviews, but believes WOG means "creators providing explicit information on stuff that did not explicitly occur within the work". Edited by crazysamaritan Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Okay. I was mainly wondering because when Word of God is linked to on work pages, there's a notice saying that Trivia entries should be moved to the Trivia tab. Does that mean something should be changed?
While Word of God, being a Trivia item, shouldn't be listed as a trope on a work's main page, the mods have apparently decided that the warning against inline potholes of Trivia items was a mistake and will be removed eventually.
(This is not the case with the similar warning on YMMV and Flame Bait potholes, for anyone whose next thought was that.)
Suddenly I'm... still rotating Fallen London in my mind even though I've stopped actively playing it.I don't know what Belkar or CE is, but "comics are delayed because my thumb was cut" is not Word of God.
Word of God is the creator commenting about their works and their universe outside the context of those works. A perfect example is all the inane, pointless babbling that J. K. Rowling has done about the Potterverse. Take, for example, Neville Longbottom. How do we know that Neville's parents were tortured into insanity by Voldemort? Because the books said so; that's canon. How do we "know" that Neville supposedly married Hannah Abbott? Because Rowling can't stop blabbing and said so during casual remarks. That's Word of God.
Personally I agree with the Death of the Author folks; Neville's not married to Hannah Abbott until Rowling writes and publishes a book where he's married to Hannah Abbott.
^I guess it would be, yes. "My thumb was cut" seems more like DVD Commentary in literary form.
Word of God is a out-of-universe (i.e., RL) statement made by a creator establishing something to be (or not be) canonical within a work. It has nothing to do with any RL stuff going on outside the work, even if it affects the creation. Any such uses should be removed.
Also, Word of God is a meta-concept. Though it is trivia, it should not be used as an example in and of itself, such as:
- Word of God: The creator said X.
Its primary use should be as part of the description of In-Universe examples, establishing the veracity of something not established in the work itself. Its secondary use is on WMG subpages. While we do not require citations, uses of Word of God should give some indication of what the source is (an interview with the creator, a forum post, etc.) so that someone could, in theory, independently verify it.
Edited by Fighteer "It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

Word of God is supposed to be about the creators giving the answer to something ambiguous about the work, In-Universe. But I often see it used differently, as the creators providing information on the out-of-universe development of the work. Is this misuse and can I change it?