Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I don't think Base Breaking Characters can be Unintentionally Unsympathetic because a character being base-breaking implies the unsympathy isn't universal enough.
Edited by ADragoThe BaseBreakingCharacter Cleanup
thread might be able to help you with this question.
I'd say cut all except Ginny's entry, which could at least use a rewrite to be less complainy, and nuke the Creator's Pet bit at the beginning as that's blatant shoehorning.
To trope, or not to trope...that is the question.Honestly, it sounds like there's a lot of bashing in each entry, especially Ginny's. I think each of them should stay in Base-Breaking Character since none of them truly fit Unintentionally Unsympathetic and all of them legitimately have a fair amount of both a fandom and a hatedom (which fits BBC pretty much to a T), but they need to be rewritten to sound more neutral, especially since character bashing or personal bias of any kind is not allowed here. They should be rewritten to reflect why some fans like them and some fans hate them. As katethegr8 said above, these entries are far too complainy and not neutral and just overall full of bashing and bias against each of them.
Edited by mouschilight "In conversation, do you listen or wait to talk?" "I have to admit that I wait to talk, but I'm trying harder to listen." — Pulp FictionBase-Breaking Character isn't just "has a fair amount of both a fandom and a hatedom" though, it's "a character who is either loved or hated with very little or no middle ground even long after the work debuted."
"I squirm, I struggle, ergo I am. Faced with death, I am finally, truly alive."Actually, the Laconic page of Base-Breaking Character says "Some think they're awesome, some think they're The Scrappy." So continuing from my post above, I think each entry should be rewritten to reflect precisely why some fans like them and other fans don't. There's way too much bashing and bias against each of them, and the moderators told me in the past that TV Tropes strives to be neutral and that bashing and bias of any kind is not allowed here. So they need to be rewritten to be more neutral and remove any kind of bias and/or bashing.
"In conversation, do you listen or wait to talk?" "I have to admit that I wait to talk, but I'm trying harder to listen." — Pulp Fiction

From ''Harry Potter":
The Base-Breaking part suggest it's not universal enough to count. Fred and George were commented out "because none of their pranks ever killed anyone. The prank in question mentioned here was shoving someone into a broken Vanishing Cabinet. The kid was not in danger of dying until HE decided to get himself out of limbo by Apparating without having a license." Ron and Molly weren't supposed to be sympathetic for those flaws, with Ron regretting the former. Ginny's possibly valid example has nothing to do with "her personality completely changing from the second book to the sixth and Harry's extremely sudden, poorly-written feelings for her", making it seem like complaining.
Should I cut or revise any of them? I'd bring this to the Unintentionally Unsympathetic Cleanup
but they still haven't replied to my last inquiry.