Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
The example above seems to be a stretch since it uses Alternate Character Interpretation to make someone apply for the trope. I would say cut it.
The 'however' section seemed to elaborate on the previous point, rather than contradict it completely. Still, it does offer valid reasons for the 'sympathetic' nature of the character.
It is probably a one-sided example, if there are clear mitigating circumstances. A creature responding to prior treatment - as in Shelley's Frankenstein - is probably a different trope. You could probably cut that, as it has unmentioned circumstances which undercut the example.
"Hello. Casually, tell her that she's died."

From YMMV.Super 8:
I've cut the last part for violating Repair, Don't Respond, but should I completely cut the example is the context behind it is contested? I'd bring this to the Unintentionally Unsympathetic Cleanup
but they still haven't replied to my last inquiry.