Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Or at least could be moved to List.Brows Held High
OH MY GOD; MY PARENTS ARE GARDENIIIIINNNNGGGGG!!!!!I'm pretty sure the List/ namespace
is deprecated. There have been other articles in that namespace that have been cut in the past.
Well there are other such lists, not only for review shows, but for even Mystery Science Theater 3000, so this might be broad enough for a whole forum thread discussing them.
Edited by DragonQuestZ I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.^ The MST 3 K list would also need to go. That isn't evidence that the practice is good or on mission. Moreover, there's been dozens of similar pages cut already and mods have already commented on the issue in ATT, though I can't link to the specific thread atm.
Such content is fitting for, say, Wikipedia or a fan Wikia site.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyalthough MST 3 K is definitely more list-worthy IMO
OH MY GOD; MY PARENTS ARE GARDENIIIIINNNNGGGGG!!!!!Troping MST 3 K episodes should be fine as long as it is done in the right place. Which is not the original work's page, but rather in Recap.Mystery Science Theater 3000 . Also, I might add, that recap page pretty much makes a list of MST 3 K episodes redundant.
This signature says something else when you aren't looking at it.Listing the episodes featured is one thing, and listing works reviewed is yet another, but making that list into an index is something else entirely. It's completely arbitrary and unhelpful.
Unless there's merit in something like Referenced by… or Shout-Out except it's more like Reviewed By. But I personally don't see the point in that.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyBecause of precedent, I would rather wait for a mod to comment. I mean, we don't seem to be going anywhere.
Also, fans would add to the list whether it was helpful or not. The question of helpfulness is whether the index is helpful for most readers looking for those works. Obviously, the answer to that question is no, since there's no real way of being aware of that reviewer's work unless you've already heard of them.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty

Oancitizen List is an arbitrary list and should be cut. It is just a list of works reviewed by some guy on the Internet, as opposed to an official list or published list of some sort. There is precedent for removing this content from the wiki, as seen here
at the page type corrections thread, where we cut 19 lists that were similar.