Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
If anything it could use some trimming, at least. There's a lot of speculation in there; all that stuff about how it's a Take That! at certain countries could probably go. I'd say the general gist of it ("some see the manga's emphasis on the downsides of extreme political correctness as a parallel to overly harsh hate crime laws") could be a valid example, but it would need to be pretty vague to avoid getting on the wrong side of the Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment.
Reaction Image RepositoryConsidering that within that mess of natter there's a fragment saying Word of God is that it's not a take that at any country, that part about the countries can probably be cut with prejudice as speculation.
To me, saying 'it's possibly a smack at Freedonia even though word of God says it's not' smacks of a couple different problems.
Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry PratchettShould I take it to the "Is This An Example?
" thread? Because I'm not really sure how to properly use What Do You Mean, It's Not Political? myself, so I don't know how to do go about improving that entry, if it's improvable at all. Other than correcting "world of" to "country of Japan in", since that is where the work is centred and where the strict equality laws are present (the laws in the rest of the world are not really brought up).
Also have a suspicion the troper that added it wants to shoehorn in their particular political views as "how things should be" in that entry.

In YMMV.A Centaurs Life, I noticed this entry:
I know deleting or altering YMMV is not allowed except for factually incorrect statments, but what of opinions that are not really about the work itself? In this case, as a resident, I wouldn't describe Canada's hate crime laws as "increasingly draconian" nor would I put quotes around "hate crime", but I'm not sure changing that in the entry because I don't agree with it is right.
Edited by homogenized