Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I'd personally say to axe it. Aside from being only tangentially relevant to the actual work being troped, it also falls massively foul of the Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment.
Edited by JapaneseTeeth Reaction Image RepositoryOK, I'll cut the example, but I'd like to bring attention to the Unfortunate Implications example as follows:
- Unfortunate Implications: Some
people
claim the book is anti-Muslim because it features no heroic Muslim characters, or then at least mainstream Muslims who condemn religiously motivated violence, to counter the bad ones, though Miller denies any such intention.
There are also reviewers who disagree with the assessment
as well. The fact that Miller has made some controversial comments about Muslims in the past (as compiled here
(starting at 9:21 into the video) from Linkara's review of this comic) doesn't make matters any better. Ultimately, it falls on the opinion of the reader.
Given how divisive Frank Miller got in recent years, and how he openly admitted Holy Terror was "Batman fighting al-Qaeda"... would a page lock be worth anything, or a Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgement note at the top?

On the Holy Terror page (about a comic book written by American author Frank Miller) someone felt the need to interject Real Life Dutch politician Geert Wilders (as background: he's best-known for his stance against immigration of non-Westerners, specifically Islamic, people into the Netherlands; and is in the Netherlands a political figure as polarizing as Donald Trump is in the U.S. (and lately frequently compared to the latter)). It seems nonsensical to drag a Real Life politician who doesn't have any relevance to the comic book plot (written by and set in a different country than said politician) into this entry, it seems almost as trolling. Also as a double whammy, a lot of natter then follows about the nature of the U.S. and its constitution - doesn't seem relevant to the comic book either.
Probably better to remove the Geert Wilders (and the natter about the U.S. constitution?) stuff out of this entry, but knowing how polarizing political stuff is, I wanted to ask for feedback here first. This is the entry: