Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Fighteer
MOD
(Time Abyss)
2017-02-02 12:51:19
No, you're right to remove it again. I'll pop that troper for ZCE violations.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Candi
Since: Aug, 2012

[[tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=Segal 991 Segal 991]] tried to fill a previously commented-out Zero Context Example in Characters.Banjo Kazooie by merely adding "Just look at her" to Ms. Fanservice (the involved character is Humba Wumba). I commented it out back because that said absolutely nothing on whether the trope (for starters, the trope has to be addressed In-Universe, i.e. the work itself has to deliberately portray the character as Fanservice-rife). Then the troper uncommented it and the only difference is that the text was marginally expanded: "Just look at her! Quite the sexy and cute one, isn't she?". That not only contains the same problem I mentioned before, but now it reads even more natter-y and lewd-like than ever.
I'm having the urge to comment it out again or even remove it under the reasoning that the game simply makes not effort at highlighting the "fanservice" aspect of the character. Unfortunately, doing just that would probably qualify as an Edit War so I'm bringing the issue here. I had already sent a ZCE Issue Helper to Segal upon the first offense so I don't think doing it again will help.