Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I don't think this is an unfortunate implication about fan reactions. If I am reading it correctly, it is saying that there is a racist implication in the work, that you have a good chance of seeing if you are Japanese.
Unfortunate implications have always been the sort of thing where sometimes you need to squint a little to see it.
No that isn't what the example says. The example refers the the belief that Americans are blaming Japanese developers for adding tropes to appeal to Japanese players, thus resulting in a game hated by Americans.
The example itself is saying that this is racist of American FANS to say because Japanese fans didn't like the game either.
That's... A bit of a stretch to me. It's entirely possible to dislike Executive Meddling and the like without being racist against anyone caught in the middle.
Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry PratchettI watched the linked video, and it's about Americans (or Westerners in general) being racist towards Japanese people for claiming that Samus appearing weaker and more helpless than usual is because of a supposedly inherent sexist attitude towards women in Japanese culture (details of which are on the Values Dissonance entry on the game's YMMV page here).
I'm not sure that example should stay.
Edited by supergod For we shall slay evil with logic...I don't think that's a valid example of Unfortunate Implications. Internet Backdraft maybe, but the example is troping the fan reaction, not the work itself as described on UT's page. I think we pull a SCOTUS and remove based on the technicality.
Edited by StarSword Trust me, I'm an engineer!That should absolutely not stay. It's not Unfortunate Implications for the game, it's Unfortunate Implications for that group of people.
For example, if in a review of the game a reviewer said something with unfortunate implications (not pointing them out in the game, but making his own), that UI entry would go on his page, not the game's.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Okay, I removed the entry for the reasons given above. If anybody wants to refute it, they can take it to the discussion page
.

I was reading through the YMMV page for Metroid: Other M, and I found this entry under Unfortunate Implications.
Is this type of UI okay? It's not talking about the implications from the work itself, but about fan critiques on the game. I've never seen a UI entry applied to a fandom before, and I just want to reach some sort of consensus on it. Is any meta entry all right as long as it has a citation?
Edited by chasemaddigan