Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
It doesn't look like either version really gets at the point the book is trying to make. I'd make it something like:
- Ender's Game: Deconstructed. Military Child Prodigy Ender Wiggin says at one point that he can only defeat his enemies if he understands them better than they understand themselves, and that he can't understand them that completely unless he also loves them the way they love themselves. The fact that the moment at which he best loves and understands his enemy is also the moment at which he utterly destroys them causes him great personal anguish and self-loathing.
I like High Crate's version. The other two really don't get the point of him being a child soldier who doesn't process enemy and ally the way an adult does. (In the short story I originally read, he didn't even know he was fighting a real enemy until after the planet went kaboom -which the adults told him not to do, but not why.)
Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett

ading altered the following example in All-Loving Hero: "* Ender's Game:" Ender Wiggin loves everyone, including the Buggers he's trying to kill. His friends semi-worship him." to "Ender's Game: Ender Wiggin claims, and believes, that he loves even his enemies. Doesn't stop him from brutally murdering them all, though. While most of it is in self-defence, there's also instances where he beats people who were only nuisances to death, including the first bully he kills in the book."
Opinions?
Edited by MagBas