TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

wrm5 Since: Mar, 2014
2014-12-05 13:23:29

Dunno much about ynet, but I do believe The Guardian is a well respected paper in Britain, so I'll say yes.

SolipSchism Since: Jun, 2014
2014-12-05 13:28:34

^ I thought even though Unfortunate Implications needs sources, the sources themselves are still subject to There Is No Such Thing As Notability. So as long as you're not using something you wrote yourself as a source, any source would be acceptable.

Edited by SolipSchism
Fighteer MOD (Time Abyss)
2014-12-05 14:07:06

We don't want to have to have an independent panel of experts evaluating every UI claim. For that reason, though, you should try to pick a source that's at least slightly credible. If we really get to the point where we have to apply Wikipedia-style standards of notability to Unfortunate Implications, we'll give up and apply an Example Sectionectomy instead. So be cautious.

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Rabbitearsblog Since: Jan, 2014
2014-12-05 14:35:46

Alright. I just want to make sure that I don't get sources that would be controversial to the page. But, I'll add the Borat example to the page now.

I love animation, TV, movies, YOU NAME IT!
Top