Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
So... yeah. Between the fact that Faith was, you know, kind of seriously evil at that point and Angel wasn't, it has to go. She's willing to potentially kill an evil human being in order to save an ally and good person (who happens to be a vampire). The way it's worded, it's like she wants to sacrifice an innocent human being in order to feed a monster that she loves. Never mind the fact that killing Faith would be a net gain for good because it would activate the next Slayer. I'd say killing the bad guy to save the life of a good guy is heroic, even if the good guy happens to not be human.
I'd leave Moral Event Horizon, but clean up the language and blatant bias in it because as written it's just a rant by someone who loves Faith's leather pants.
... and this is coming from someone who thinks Buffy overall becomes a Designated Hero. It's just that it has nothing to do with that episode.
EDIT: I did just that.
Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.

I was going to do some edits for season ten of Buffy the Vampire Slayer when I came across this.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/YMMV/BuffyTheVampireSlayer
I gotta say Mickey Moose does raise a valid point but do the edits come off as maybe a little...edgy perhaps? Designated Hero is a fair shake for this scene?