Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
To give a sense of size for anyone who doesn't go and check out the page source, it's thirteen lines commented out, there's one line saying that spoiler tagging trope names is against policy (using the trope name page), a second line providing warning that mods have acted against repeat violators, and a third line listing the two ways wiki-talk suggested to get around the "trope name spoils too much" dilemma (deleting it outright or hiding it in another trope under it's spoiler-tagged text).

Over at the The Walking Dead Video Game page I've gone through and unspoilered all trope names per the policy (after spending a lot of time checking that was okay through the forum and after seeing that policy cited time and again here on ATT) and, despite increasing the commented out warning from two lines to the entire initial browser screen and including a bold warning at the top of the page to let readers know that trope names won't be spoiler tagged, Emperor_Z went and changed two tropes so they were entirely spoilered.
It's been reverted by another troper already, but at what point does it cease to be other editor's responsibilities to make sure the policy is clear (I included the policy in my initial edits, added a message to the discussion page, a commented out warning and a warning in bold for readers to let them know that wiki policy means no spoiler tags on trope names so watch out, and it doesn't seem to be enough. I don't think Emperor_Z is ignoring them intentionally, just wondering if I should just keep it polite and send a PM to link them to the policy and only bring mods in if there's proof they know about the policy and are ignoring it anyway (for the record I've been handling it that way so far and two out of the three people replied with a "sorry I didn't know, I'll go fix that" so I haven't seen anyone causing trouble yet).
Edited by Shaoken