Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I brought this up in that article's discussion, and I looked over the sentences after I changed them to make sure they were fine. It's not needed to mention the Nerd/Critic in the description, Caustic Critic and This Is Gonna Suck, because it just makes it look like this guy can't stand on his own and needs to be compared to his "more popular" counterparts to get people to watch. And yes, I take Critic references out of work pages (like, I dunno, Patch Adams) because it's usually just spouting one of his memes, something we don't allow.
I admit one of my faults is never checking the discussion pages - mostly because I've never have quite gotten the hang of how such pages work. Thing is, can't we at least allow the page in the introductory paragraph? Because while memes are a disgrace to mankind on this site, I was simply referencing a famous work within its own medium. Think about it - how many MSTing works do have a reference to Mystery Science Theater 3000 as their introduction? Heck, the very MSTing trope is named after that show, and as such comparisons to it are drawn in the introductions to articles such as, say, Retsupurae or Un Skippable.
Also, as I said, if you want to cut something is fine. Just make sure the article still makes sense after you've done it, at least. Please.
I'm from Piedmont. No relation with Piedmon, mind you!Well, no problem then. I'll deal with the deletion among the examples myself, although the opening's comparison to NC and AVGN will be kept as reference.
Bear in mind, though, that I'm a fan of both Yotobi and NC (which is sadly a rarity here in Italy), and therefore the comparison was never meant as disservice in the first place.
Also, I have to apologize as well for the whole, you know, "Wiki Vandal" thing. I didn't know about the discussion page (because I could never suspect there would already be one for that article in the first place), so the deletion just kind of caught me off guard.
I'm from Piedmont. No relation with Piedmon, mind you!Okay, I changed the examples, added more details to the comparison within the opening paragraph and added a disclaimer at the end of it, hidden within two "%%s". I hope it helps.
I'm from Piedmont. No relation with Piedmon, mind you!

I started an article today (Yotobi) and wrote some comparisons to The Nostalgia Critic in order to provide a reference that would allow other tropers to get "what this is about". Unfortunately, this resulted in "They have 'popularized' it, but they're not the only ones and it's shoehorning to keep mentioning them in other reviewer pages."
as a justification to cut every reference to TGWTG members in that article. I'm not mad just because it's an article I started myself, but 1) the cutter didn't care about the orphaned sentences making any more sense or not, and 2) the whole "in other reviewer pages" implies this "correction" has been done in other pages. The question is, did I spot a Wiki Vandal or am I in the wrong here?