Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
For the record, Twibill's already been suspended from editing cuz of events described in this query.
They also stuffed up their indentation in that example block.
I can see a couple threads on the first page of the Visual Novels forum about Danganronpa. I recommend taking the whole example block to them for sanity-checking. If they approve it, it can stay. Otherwise, cut it and leave a commented note not to re-add Broken Aesop unless you've cleared the example with the cleanup thread.
Trust me, I'm an engineer!^To be honest, the Discussion tabs in general aren't checked very often unless people are specifically pinged to visit them.
Trust me, I'm an engineer!

On July 29th, 2024, Lord Twibill added back Broken Aesop to Danganronpa, even through its own Broken Aesop page (which was made by the same troper, by the way) was called into question by another troper
and got cut due to many of the examples of Aesops that were broken instead coming across as one person complaining about certain aspects of the franchise.
That wasn't the first time someone attempted to add Broken Aesop to the YMMV page for Danganronpa. Looking at that page's edit history
reveals that someone did try to add entries for Broken Aesop, only for someone else to remove it one day later. That edit happened after the Broken Aesop page for Danganronpa was cut.
Looking at the Broken Aesop entry, it still feels like one person complaining. I'm not sure if those examples feel a lot better now that Broken Aesop has been redefined as an opinion trope. Talking about this topic might be messy since the troper who made that edit has a history of getting suspended for edit warring. At the time of writing, they're currently suspended. Again. Ugh...
What do you think about this? Should something be done about that example?
Edited by AperturePublishing