Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Regardless who's right here (I have not seen the movie), the approach you suggested (a differing opinion, like "On the other hand,..." slapped underneath it), is very much Conversation in the Main Page and should generally be avoided.
Also, I'm not sure if that example write-up fits under Narm, even if your interpretation is totally correct. Narm is finding a moment that is meant to be serious and dramatic to be unintentionally funny — I don't really see that in the example you provided.
Edited by ZakuraOk, so when restoring it I could reword a little to reflect the fact that I find this moment to be weird, out of place and thus humorous because there's quite rightly abject pandemonium (thus it's serious and dramatic) going on in the scene and yet the Jenkins patriarch's mind is all of a sudden somewhere WILDLY else. Fine. Now you see why it's Narm (plus I figured the YouTube videos would help illustrate that point, too). And isn't there a way on a YMMV page (note: not the main page as you suggested, Zakura, outside of maybe Ambiguous Situation) to show a differing opinion, even if it's as an example under a different YMMV trope to show that NOYB thought it was in fact anything but Narm?
Edited by FlashStepsI removed it because it seemed so obvious when you look at that clip that he is feeling intimidated and smiling awkwardly to cover it as he realizes this woman he hit on before is dangerous, rather than him feeling horny, that I thought surely the person who put it in must have been the only viewer of the movie to ever think that, and surely even they would go "oh" and realize they misread it after having it pointed out what the real intention was. Even the passage itself said it was "weird" and "out of character" for him to be horny in that scene, and that explains it: he wasn't.
In the event he was meant to be horny, it wouldn't be Narm because making him act that way in the midst of pandemonium can only be an intentional gag as part of the comedy of the movie. He's already portrayed as a comedic, smarmy and blustery character. Narm has to be *unintentionally* funny, not just a contrast to what's going on around the character. Making characters act in contrast to their surroundings is a classic form of intentional humor, in fact. Even everyone in the restaurant freaking out as people turn into mice is probably supposed to be more goofy than dramatic. The trope namer for Narm was what's supposed to be the heart-wrenching cry of "Narm!" by an injured person being unintentionally funny/silly. This is a comedic fool being a comedic fool. Mood Dissonance, Dissonant Serenity or something similar would be a better fit. It could only be Narm if the actor had been trying for a serious face and looked goofy instead *by accident*.
Edited by NOYB

Warning: spoilers for the work in question, including a video link to a climactic scene. Discretion advised.
On The Witches (1990), NOYB decided to remove my edit under Narm which read:
with the reason:
"Mr Jenkins is clearly scared of the GHW when he says that."
I'm sorry, but hard YMMV here. And of course, the troper in question made the removal on the movie's YMMV page. That is to say, the foremost class of page where subjectivity is the name of the game. Let me argue my case, as if the paragraph I had wrote wasn't quite enough on it's own, with receipts. Jenkins clearly hits on the Grand High Witch in this earlier scene (there's a bit more to it in the full movie, where he elaborates on how he admires her supposed "RSPCA work" and associated "philanthropy"):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLfb9Zx4ZRQ
Then, in this subsequent scene, check it out (timestamped to the relevant moment where my paragraph was chiefly concerned):
https://youtu.be/QsuIp03FENc?si=bnrp0WmmSRgE4v1y&t=53
I do not see fear in his expression at all. That's not a scared smile. I see a man who was excited by this exotic woman from his earlier introduction to her, and sorry to be crude, but in this latter scene, it's as if he's even hornier. And as I said, given the chaotic context of the scene, it's oddly out of character. The man is not cringing in fear (however his wife is), but instead his inappropriate lust kinda makes the audience cringe. I can't be the only one who sees that, right? And again, if NOYB disagreed and saw fear, they could have instead made an edit underneath to state something like "On the other hand, some viewers see Mr Jenkins as instead being afraid of the GHW in this moment" (such a counter-statement approach being true to the nature of YMMV pages), instead of deleting my example with no real justification.
So, I'm requesting some validation and support to restore the contribution I'd made, as it has some real weight.
Edited by FlashSteps