The TVTropes Trope Finder is where you can come to ask questions like "Do we have this one?" and "What's the trope about...?" Trying to rediscover a long lost show or other medium but need a little help? Head to Media Finder and try your luck there. Want to propose a new trope? You should be over at the Trope Launch Pad.
Itsbrown4606
Since: Jul, 2011

I don't know if anyone by chance caught Sunday's new episode of Mythbusters, but if you did, you may already have this one stuck in your head.
This happens towards the beginning of the episode. After they introduce the "Ballistic Barrel" secondary myth, they cut to the bomb range to set up their initial proof-of-concept test. In this test, they are testing whether or not methanol in a barrel can ignite. Now let me paint the picture for you:
They have a 55-gallon barrel strapped to a 4-wheel frame, horizontally, with the opened... eh, hole... at the top. On top of this barrel is a crash-test dummy who is lying face down on top of the barrel with its backside facing a ramp that's behind the barrel. On this ramp, there is an RC car with a road flare strapped to it... and it's really protruding out the front of the cart. The plan is to drive the car up safely to the barrel and use the road flare to ignite the methanol fumes.
Do you see where I'm going with this? (If not, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3X85StYJjE#t=8m55s
) For an added bonus, Grant udders the phrases, "We have achieved the hole. The fire is in the hole!" (Don't believe me? Video.) These phrases are immediately folded by a cut of the RC car repeatedly backing up and bumping against the barrel.
So, the question is: Is this something worth mentioning on the Mythbusters page? If so, what would this be considered? Freud Was Right? Accidental Innuendo?
Edited by Itsbrown4606