Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I think some of it is people not realizing you can create multiple paragraphs with the double-backslash notation for things other than quotes.
Trust me, I'm an engineer!Checking though the page history of YMMV.Toy Story (where they used to be) shows those have been there since before February 2011, though the change to one of the bullets to violate proper example indentation was done in March 2020
by Vulgar Bee.
I mean, I would hardly say that Sid is obviously villainous. He's a kid, and most of the animators admitted to relating to him more than Andy, who they jokingly called a freak for being so good to his toys. Sid is only a villain because the toys are sentient. So it's a pretty big stretch to say it's whitewashing.
Working on: Author Appeal | Sandbox | Troper WallIt is absolutely a stretch to call it whitewashing, and I've seen this particular ACI in a lot of places. Looking at most of Sid's behavior realistically, he's no worse than the average child his age, especially one with potentially neglectful parents. He is a villain, but only because we are looking at this from the toys' perspective.
(I do recall it being mentioned he picks on Andy, though, but that diesn't change the fact that this is a valid ACI entry. Imo the biggest issue is that the entry is way too long.)
Edited by Octoya^"picks on Andy"
Is that in one of the recent sequels? Because I don't remember that from 1 or 2.
Trust me, I'm an engineer!^No, Sid never interacts with Andy in 1, doesn't appear in 2, only makes a cameo (as an adult) in 3, and neither he nor Andy are in 4. If it happens in any supplemental materials, I'd be slow to accept their canonicity.
My musician page

On YMMV.Toy Story 1, Alternative Character Interpretation has multiple entries for Sid, and they look disorganized, with not all of them looking like individual interpretations. Can someone take a look?
Also, does the first one count? Most audiences understand that Sid didn't know toys were alive.