Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
The first really isn't relevant. It may be true but the modern-ness of the Civil War has what to do with the trope?
The second really should be worked into the sentence itself; it's hiding the relevant part behind a note which changes the meaning of the sentence 180 degrees. That's pure conversation in the main page. At the very least the non-note part of the sentence needs to address the inaccuracy and the note can clarify it.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.^ So something like this would be more acceptable?
Yeah, that makes a lot more sense.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I think that paragraph could use a rewrite to incorporate the notes directly into it without having to be clicked to view them. Not defending Discar here (what they did is still wrong and against policy), but I do understand how anyone would view these notes as Natter since they look disjointed from the rest of the paragraph.
Edited by DivineFlame100I agree with the removal of the first note, and I'd tweak that inclusion of the second thusly:

On the Hero's Slave Harem page, Tropers.Discar changed this section of the description:
By removing both notes, citing "Note Natter" as an edit reason.
I've never heard of "Note Natter" being a thing, although, I can certainly see how notes could be irrelevant to an example. However, this isn't an example — it's the description — and on a trope HEAPED with tons of Unfortunate Implications. IMO, the notes (the second one, at least) were extremely important for explaining exactly why the trope is so contentious.
Edited by NubianSatyress