Crosspost from Troper Updates:
Name of chapter: "Mongol Eurasia and Its Aftermath"
Questions:
- What accounts for the magnitude and speed of the Mongol conquests?
- What benefits resulted from the integration if Eurasia in the Mongol Empire?
- How did the effect of Mongol rule on Russia and the lands of Islam differ from its effect on East Asia?
- In what ways did the Ming Empire continue or discontinue Mongol practices?
edited 17th Dec '09 6:03:12 PM by Wicked223
You can't even write racist abuse in excrement on somebody's car without the politically correct brigade jumping down your throat!I can answer 1 pretty well.
Unlike Western armies, relying on power over speed, the Mongol armies were a fast, organized lot, grouped into groups of a thousand men each.
You could say that they did the Blitzkrieg first.
INT is knowing a tomato is a fruit. WIS is knowing it doesn't belong in a fruit salad. CHA is convincing people that it does.3) By staying nomadic they didn't deal directly with the Russians even though they had invaded and were in control. With the Islamic countries they were tolerant of there religion even going as far as to convert from Shamanism to Islam.
Hope this helps Wicked.
I'ma cut A,B,C,D in the top of your head. But don't worry sugar you ain't gone be dead.And to add to number 3...
The proximity of East Asia to the Mongol homelands meant that after Genghis Khan's death, the area over which they had the most control of was China, thus founding Kublai Khan's Yuan dynasty.
INT is knowing a tomato is a fruit. WIS is knowing it doesn't belong in a fruit salad. CHA is convincing people that it does.Need some verification of Maxwell's first Law of Electromagnetics:
∇D where D = €o E in free space as written in cartesian coordinates is ∂/∂x(Dx) + ∂/∂y(Dy) + ∂/∂z(Dz), is equal to ρv
That means then that by Gauss' Law:
∫s D∙dS = Q = ∫vol ∇Ddv = ∫vol ρvdv
Does the above relation hold true for all cases, including different coordinate systems (i.e. cylindrical and spherical), because admittedly, I haven't quite got the hang of deriving the divergence of functions in cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems.
edited 12th Jan '10 4:41:31 AM by Mapi
My FF.net account@ Kinkajou: I think Cao Cao did Blitrzkrieg before Ghengis Khan, I remember something about crossing a ridiculous distance in a couple of days just to attack an unprepared city...
But as for the rest of this, I think I am way out of my depth in the education department...
As I type this I have a sword in one hand and a gun in the other.I just need some clarification for this assignment here.
1. Take the Sensory Modality Preference Inventory. (See the included example) http://www.brookhavencollege.edu/learningstyle/modality_test.html
Print a copy and save as a word document. Are you up for a challenge? See how creative you are in your research in finding an additional inventory to send.
2. Explore/research (Internet & books) different Modality Preferences.
3. Using the Landmark Note-Taking style summarize the information.
I've got number one finished, but I don't really understand what Landmark Note-Taking Style is. I've been looking around on Google for a while.
edited 12th Jan '10 8:47:29 PM by AXavierB
[1]
Looks to me like the style is about splitting a piece of paper in half and making a list comparing two sides to an issue. Soooo, you take your primary learning style and your secondary learning style and make a list of how to incorporate the two methods.
I could also be totally full of shit.
@William: What I mean to say is, how can I show that the relationships also hold true in cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems? Or something like that.
My FF.net accountyay I"m unhelpful
edited 23rd Jan '10 10:10:23 PM by Tzetze
[1] This facsimile operated in part by synAC.Mathematically, I think they are both Integral transforms with different kernals, IIRC. Don't know the details though.
edited 23rd Jan '10 10:15:26 PM by zzzdragon
Fear the Gothilolions! | Anime listWe're taking up Fourier next week and tomorrow's exam is on Laplace, So Yeah... We're going to end up playing with Octave in lab; since the new exercise is Fourier transforms.
My FF.net accountI know they're related, let's see what The Other Wiki says since I can't find the summary in my NCEES equation book.
edited 23rd Jan '10 11:28:06 PM by Deboss
Fight smart, not fair.Tzetze has quoted that but I want to know how different they are in process, i.e. solving them. For Laplace we can do it by definition and perform the integral OR derive/memorize the table of Laplace transforms due to the one-to-one rule.
Does this apply to Fourier?
My FF.net account

I wish I could help. But I can't. What I know about coding you could write on the inside of a matchbook. With a marker. And still read it.
edited 14th Dec '09 8:29:52 PM by Madrugada