That was my take, and if it's available on You Tube, then it's likely not cut-worthy.
HoMM Fan
It's just edgy humor, not pedo pandering.
Keep, painfully unfunny as it is.
"Grandmaster Combat, son!"
The series isn’t any more graphic than say South Park or Family Guy (there is child nudity but no genitalia is shown and they aren’t drawn in a way that’s meant to be sexually appealing). Every joke is just “Father Tucker molests children”. It’s just another “edgy” webseries that confuses just being disturbing and offensive with Black Comedy.
Edited by TheLivingDrawing on Aug 23rd 2022 at 12:26:45 PM
Once Upon A Time.It's a 2012 Flash animation following a priest (and one time a Pope Benedict stand-in as a former Nazi soldier?) with Creepy High-Pitched Voice voice abusing his position to do disgusting things (eating cut foreskin?! a dead kid being turned into a basketball?! force-feeding drugs?!) and doesn't bother hiding it, and somehow adults fail to realize the problem. Nothing explicit but there is lot of obvious off-screen molestation.
This sometimes felt like a pandering, but with everything being comically exaggerated and one episode being a clear Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog parody, I think it only intended to be as gross as possible with some degree of humor. So it's a "wish it was cut but there's not really anything policy-violating" from me.
TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Being painfully unfunny and mistaking being as disturbing and offensive as possible for “Black Comedy” are sadly not grounds to cut something.
I think "pretty graphic" in the description could be elaborated, as while it relies on Squick, there's nothing really NSFW imagery-wise. Beside that I think there's nothing to do, at least here.
TroperWall / WikiMagic CleanupLooks like we have a consensus that this isn't paedobait, and apparently there is little concern for the current state of the page. Disposing this as "keep", tagging and closing.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

The flag here for FatherTucker was sent with the rationale
I am not familiar with the work, but I have read the work page and its YMMV page (which I'm also going to report). The work's description states that it's about a paedophilic priest who molests children in every episode and gets away with it; the description also warns that the work can get very graphic, so advises no direct linking to the videos. The page quote is also quite explicit: "A faith in God A friendly smile He'll warm your heart And rape your child!"
Some of the trope entries describe the behaviour he gets up to, including entries for tropes, such as:
The associated YMMV page doesn't have many entries, but does indicate how graphic the show can get:
I have not gone in search of the work to investigate it myself because the trope entries on both the work page and the YMMV are informative enough to put me off even searching for it. I therefore think the two pages are informative enough by themselves for me to flag this even though I'm not familiar with the actual work.