Angry babby
I was the one who made the report. I went a bit further in the story afterwards and discovered there are indeed sex scenes with the other "lolis." ![[tup]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Thumbs_up_emoticon_3268.png "[thumb up]"){kind=small}
to cutting.
CG for short
The title and cover alone is concerning enough, and with what Mighty Mewtron said, cut
Cut for the reasons above.
❀ Mint, Nuts, and Waffle ❀
for cutting.
Bonnie's Artistic Cousin
Cut
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Hi
Snippity snip.
No opinion on the work in question, but I'd like to note that one concern with switching to a public review system was that folks would be analyzing works superficially. Such as things like judging them by their title...
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Okay, first off, we can rule out pure porn just by the trope list. And Septimus is right that we don't damn by the title alone.
So...is that front cover pedopandering? Because while we don't engage in superficial cuts, for the "this is pedo fap material" standard, we can judge a book by its illustrations, yes?
I despise hypocrisy, unless of course it is my own.
Angry babby
As I said before, I read the first few chapters months ago and it didn't take long to find porny content of characters who look like kids. I can refresh my memory later but I didn't make the report until I'd read three chapters.
The cover admittedly doesn't look that much like a child but the whole "loli" thing pushes it into pedopandering. I need to double check how the characters are described.
Edited by mightymewtron on Jul 22nd 2022 at 12:36:20 PM
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Showtime!
I think that this is pedopandering based on the aex scenes, throwing it in for a cut
Edited by Libraryseraph on Jul 22nd 2022 at 12:37:42 PM
Absolute destiny... apeachalypse?
Angry babby
Okay, getting back to the actual story to find some context.
- Narrator, Ryusei, is a 16 year old boy but gets put into a body, Milla Walpurgis, that explicitly looks like a "little girl" who stands at about 4'7''.
- Grace is apparently an adult.
- Grace and Milla have sex in Chapter 4. We don't see it but there's build-up where Milla fondles Grace and a post-coital scene that involves a mention of... "leaking." It is clearly meant to be sexy. I think they date after this.
Most of this seems to be a fantasy story, and there's many chapters. The YMMV page says there's gratuitous sex scenes everywhere, and even just the one with Grace should be enough to cut because Milla is meant to look like a child.
Edited by mightymewtron on Jul 24th 2022 at 9:05:36 AM
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
Based on the above mentioned reasons, I vote cut.
TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
Chop chop.
I despise hypocrisy, unless of course it is my own.
Blitzy....
Yeah, I can't see how this is kosher.
Just made a server on discord.Come join me.
Calling this for cutting; locked, cut and tagged. Closing.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
The flag here for LivingAsIPleaseAsALoliDemonKing was sent with the rationale