Pure Marxism envisions a transition to a worker-run economy without any real plan to get there. Marxism-Leninism and Maoism both require a totalitarian state to manage the transition, but in no country that has tried either of those systems has the end goal been realized.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I just need to add that transhumanism is not just cyborg implements. Could also turn into devas or energy beaings or whatever the fuck. I have tackeld this usbject before on other thread, but no one was very keen on the idea of mechanical implements as nothing more than manmade human tools as opposed to the great next evolutionary step of mankind.
That said communism is still silly. But it helps capitalism by selling che guevara shirts.
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesWell, many communist and socialist ideologies fall broadly under the banner of libertarian socialism, which in most forms eschews the transitional state government between capitalism and true communism seen in places like the Soviet Union, and instead elect to abolish the state immediately. The methods they employ typically involve a heavy emphasis on direct action
in order to win popular support and encourage resistance against capitalism and the state.
This video is fairly long but I think it does a good job of explaining the difference in approach:
edited 4th May '15 9:01:21 PM by Zennistrad

Some require the state to ensure that the principles get to be put in practice, some don't.