Of course, regardless, it's all meaningless in the end because Zamasu is going to come along and kill everyone before becoming Skybox Zamasu resulting in Zeno just deleting that entire timeline.
Let the joy of love give you an answer! Check out my book!Training is studying for the body when you think about it. So in actuality, Gohan didn't need to stop studying, but study in a different way through proper training to bring out his potential.
One Strip! One Strip!The question of whether Trunks as a Saiyan or Trunks as a Time Traveller is more important to whether he was ultimately able to save his timeline and facilitate the rescue of our heroes' timeline is a foolish one, because obviously wouldn't have been able to do either if even one of those two wasn't true. Attempting to ascribe primary importance to one when both are of vital and indepentent importance doesn't work.
That sounds more correct than what I said, yeah. Upon hindsight, my post did pose a false dichotomy, a "either/or" that need not be there.
Unless it requires specific pronunciation, it doesn't seem that hard to say.
Hatch-yak...
Ha-chi-yak...
Rules of the Internet 45. Rule 45 is a lie. Check out my art if you notice.![]()
The villain from Plan to Eradicate the Saiyans, the least widely known Dragon Ball movie that they probably aren't going to bother with. I mean, Goku outright told Gohan during WEN BROLY, "I think your movie is next."
He's a revenge-driven bio-android built by the Tuffles to avenge their species by eradicating the Saiyans. You may be familiar with his more well-known derivative, Baby.
edited 20th Jan '17 8:40:17 AM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.That's Dr. Raichi, the actual Big Bad of the film. He built Hatchiyack, the thing the others fight at the climax of the film.
edited 20th Jan '17 8:44:21 AM by VeryMelon
TFS said back in their trailer for Battle of Gods that they'd abridge Plan to Eradicate the Saiyans, and they stated back in their post-Broly stream that they had plans for it. Kaiser said something about maybe doing two versions of the film for the two versions released on the TFS subreddit as well.
Have you any dreams you'd like to sell?On the one hand, one of the versions is (slightly) longer, on the other, the other version is slightly better animated.
...Or, at least, was animated more recently, and was originally available digitally, and so the animation quality has degraded less over time. Whereas the other was on. I wanna say VHS tapes?

I feel like looking at two traits that both rely on the existence of the other to be relevant, and trying to cherry pick one that's more important, is a futile effort. And may, in fact, be outright fallacious.
The question of whether Trunks as a Saiyan or Trunks as a Time Traveller is more important to whether he was ultimately able to save his timeline and facilitate the rescue of our heroes' timeline is a foolish one, because obviously wouldn't have been able to do either if even one of those two wasn't true. Attempting to ascribe primary importance to one when both are of vital and indepentent importance doesn't work.
Now, the claim of whether Trunks-as-time-traveler or Trunks-as-Saiyan is more important to the narrative is a different question entirely, albeit one that one side of this argument seems to be posing and the other seems to not care about. It's a role that leans more to the former during the first half of the saga (particularly, when 17 and 18 were the main threat of the saga and Trunks' mission was more dominant in his personality), and more to the latter (or more accurately, leans more to Trunks-as-Vegeta's-son) in regards to his role during the second half of the saga. Where Trunks was important to the narrative steadily shifted bit by bit across the course of the ongoing plot.
edited 17th Jan '17 1:38:35 AM by KnownUnknown