One thing, though - I noticed that you deleted the 'Warnings' section as well as the Comments one. Think we might want to keep that around? It's less a commentary on the fic's quality, and more a list of potential triggers for readers.
On the one hand, it's a section that doesn't crop up much on other recs pages. On the other, it seems a nice little courtesy to people browsing the page.
edited 25th Oct '10 8:46:33 AM by Iaculus
What's precedent ever done for us?I'd say it is more friction than necessary. The most common use I've seen for it is to remark on Ho Yay or to bloviate on the foulness of some 'ship or the other. Very much a YMMV thing.
You'll also note I zapped the 'comments:' bullet. Let's don't even get 'em started, shall we?
edited 25th Oct '10 8:51:35 AM by FastEddie
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyI'll get started on implementing this new format on the pages for Sonic The Hedgehog and The Legend Of Zelda for now.
Also, should we change the template for the old format listed on the general Fanfic Recommendations page in lieu of the new one we aim to implement?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Fair enough. It's not like I'm especially attached to that section. It's just that we already have this notice...
Do warn when a fanfic may head into homosexual or non-canon territory. Some people just don't like it, and as we all know, Shipping is Serious Business.
... which could be seen to serve as an argument for a specific warnings section, so we might want to iron out any contradictions there.
edited 25th Oct '10 8:57:45 AM by Iaculus
What's precedent ever done for us?Just noticed that spoiler-coding doesn't seem to work in the Reviews section, despite me switching to the 'spoilers hidden by default' seting. Is this something that can be fixed, or something that we just need to work around?
edited 25th Oct '10 9:16:50 AM by Iaculus
What's precedent ever done for us?Well, that's the [PROTOTYPE] page all reviewed up. And it hasn't even collapsed into a stinking mass of code yet!
edited 25th Oct '10 9:43:36 AM by CuratorAccount
Took me an hour, but I'm finished implementing the new format on two aforementioned pages in my last post. How do they look?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.I must say, this makes the pages a lot easier to navigate. It'll be interesting to see what the big beasts, like the Naruto and Harry Potter recs pages, look like after this.
What's precedent ever done for us?Should the content tags be left on the same line as the title and link, or given their own line like Cryptic Mirror suggested?
EDIT: Eddie may have already answered this earlier...I'm thinking specifically tags like Lemon, WAFF, Dark Fic, etc.
I'll handle the Eva page as soon as I can get time to work on it; the main thing I want to do is contact the people that left review-worthy comments and find out if they want their stuff preserved or not before arbitrarily zapping it. What I think I'll do is, if the comment isn't worth making into a review, I'll just put the troper's name in the Recommended by line, with the first troper's handle bolded so it's obvious that he/she made the recommendation...or should this even be messed with?
edited 25th Oct '10 10:33:14 AM by Willbyr
Right. I have no way to know who wrote the comments so I'm just going to assume whoever recommended it wrote the comments. I also titled the reviews "Review by [insert username here]"
Edit: -looks at both pages- OH MY FREAKING GOD I HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO DO. I think I'm going to cry.
edited 25th Oct '10 11:51:34 AM by Marioguy128
You got some dirt on you. Here's some more!

Fair enough. The equals-bars are good. We shall learn to love the equals-bars. In all their... barry glory.
What's precedent ever done for us?