During the investigation of recent hollers in the Complete Monster thread, it's become apparent to the staff that an insular, unfriendly culture has evolved in the Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard threads that is causing problems.
Specific issues include:
- Overzealous hollers on tropers who come into the threads without being familiar with all the rules and traditions of the tropes. And when they are familiar with said rules and traditions, they get accused (with little evidence) of being ban evaders.
- A few tropers in the thread habitually engage in snotty, impolite mini-modding. There are also regular complaints about excessive, offtopic "socializing" posts.
- Many many thread regulars barely post/edit anywhere else, making the threads look like they are divorced from the rest of TV Tropes.
- Following that, there are often complaints about the threads and their regulars violating wiki rules, such as on indexing, crosswicking, example context and example categorization. Some folks are working on resolving the issues, but...
- Often moderator action against thread regulars leads to a lot of participants suddenly showing up in the moderation threads to protest and speak on their behalf, like a clique.
It is not a super high level problem, but it has been going on for years and we cannot ignore it any longer. There will be a thread in Wiki Talk to discuss the problem; in the meantime there is a moratorium on further Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard example discussion until we have gotten this sorted out.
Update: The new threads have been made and can be found here:
Please see the Frequently Asked Questions and Common Requests List before suggesting any new entries for this trope.
IMPORTANT: To avoid a holler to the mods, please see here for the earliest date a work can be discussed, (usually two weeks from the US release), as well as who's reserved discussion.
When voting, you must specify the candidate(s). No blanket votes (i.e. " to everyone I missed").
No plagiarism: It's fair to source things, but an effortpost must be your own work and not lifted wholesale from another source.
We don't care what other sites think about a character being a Complete Monster. We judge this trope by our own criteria. Repeatedly attempting to bring up other sites will earn a suspension.
What is the Work
Here you briefly describe the work in question and explain any important setting details. Don't assume that everyone is familiar with the work in question.
Who is the Candidate and What have they Done?
This will be the main portion of the Effort Post. Here you list all of the crimes committed by the candidate. For candidates with longer rap sheets, keep the list to their most important and heinous crimes, we don't need to hear about every time they decide to do something minor or petty.
Do they have any Mitigating Factors or Freudian Excuse?
Here you discuss any potential redeeming or sympathetic features the character has, the character's Freudian Excuse if they have one, as well as any other potential mitigating factors like Offscreen Villainy or questions of moral agency. Try to present these as objectively as possible by presenting any evidence that may support or refute the mitigating factors.
Do they meet the Heinousness Standard?
Here you compare the actions of the Candidate to other character actions in the story in order to determine if they stand out or not. Remember that all characters, not just other villains, contribute to the Heinousness Standard
Final Verdict?
Simply state whether or not you think the character counts or not.
Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 31st 2023 at 4:14:10 AM
I'd not be opposed to a Bond subpage.
Damn, so will we have to go through the Affably Evil subpages? BTW, Vandal Savage is listed there.
edited 3rd May '14 6:26:23 AM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsMight be a good idea. Vandal Savage's specific entry is badly written as is. It seems like a nattery conversation that was just compressed with proper indentation but is still arguing with itself.
- DC's Vandal Savage (who, having been alive since caveman days, is a little bit more than Really 700 Years Old) has often acted quite genteel towards Earth's heroes. OTOH, he did have an unsatisfactory minion for dinner with some of his colleagues and other subordinates. Sorry, he had the minion as dinner. And he did pressure his daughter to marry somebody, or at least to have a child. I'd categorize him as Faux Affably Evil; sociopath who is surprisingly persuasive. Not actually likable, but still fairly persuasive, if only through the controversial "agree or I burn your parents alive" technique.
I also proposed a Bond subpage.
Know for a fact that Holden, Nicodemus, Page, and Li are Faux Affably Evil.
Still have MAX!Bullseye, Burke, Balder, and Goldfinger.
Lighty, I think you can probably add your additions for Bullseye and Malekith.
edited 3rd May '14 10:08:38 AM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsI wouldn't call Goldfinger Affably Evil. He just likes flaunting how Wicked Cultured he is.
And MAX!Bullseye just seems insane. How about Burke and Balder?
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsLikewise, Faux. I support the Bond subpage, cutting Marissa and the other examples mentioned above with Freddy v. Jason and Doc X.and the Rat king and Bond rewrites
Seriously the idea Judge fucking Holden is 'affably' evil is a joke.
Alright, that takes care of those. I'll make this my to-do list:
edited 3rd Jul '14 4:35:00 PM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsCan I get rid of that movie reference in the Fenrir Greyback entry? The entry should only focus on his literary incarnation and it's not, like the entry states, merely implied he's a cannibal in the books, it's flat-out confirmed as he's shown trying to eat Harry at the Battle on the Astronomy Tower, wants to eat Hermione when Bellatrix is done torturing her, and attacks Lavender at the Battle of Hogwarts.
Also any objections if I add the following to Voldemort's entry?
- "Throughout the books Voldemort tried to open the Chamber of Secrets as a teenager to wipe out all "mud-bloods" (witches or wizards born of non-magical individuals) in Hogwarts, killed his father and grandparents and framed his uncle for the crime, ordered Cedric Diggory's murder, murdered an entire family because the mother didn't know where someone Voldemort was looking for was, indiscriminately killed his followers when given bad news, and killed the seemingly loyal, Severus Snape because he believed his minion's death would grant him greater power."
I plan on making it the third-to-last sentence of the entry.
edited 3rd May '14 1:39:38 PM by OccasionalExister
Sure, go ahead.
Should the words "Chamber of Secrets" pot-link to the book.
I think I have a candidate, Jenna, from the give yourself Goosebumps book, Scream of the evil genie.
Jenna is an evil genie who, while not quite has bad as the djinn from Wish Master is still pretty bad. Depending on the choices the reader makes, her wishes can kill the main character, have him take her place as a genie, Turn him into a living painting forever, and so on. Going over all the possible scenarios would take forever, but she is never shown in a positive light. She is just a Jackass Genie with no redeeming features.
jjjIn this case, no, since it's referring to the actual Chamber. Feel free to cut that sentence if you want about Fenrir (actually I'll do that right now). As to that Mudblood bit, I'd make it "Mud-Bloods (half-Muggles, of which he was one)"...
I HOPE she's not as bad as the Wishmaster djinn!
edited 3rd May '14 1:19:55 PM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsActually "mud-bloods" are witches or wizards born from two muggles. Half-bloods are witches or wizards born from a muggle and a mage. I will specify what a "mud-blood" is though.
You're right; I should have known that Still probably mention Voldy's Boomerang Bigotry.
Like I did; I also made a few other minor changes. Should we get rid of the part about Voldy's Freudian Excuse?
edited 3rd May '14 1:43:18 PM by ACW
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsAlso, I'd like to mention Umbridge sending two Dementors after Harry and his cousin as well as Fenrir's actions during the Battle of the Astronomy Tower (trying to eat Harry), and the Battle of Hogwarts (trying to eat Lavender).
We should probably keep that Voldy's Freudian Excuse serves more as a cautionary tale rather than a true one just so that no one would think that he's not as bad as we let on.
Zorin... I know someone (can't recall who) argued against him on the basis that they thought he had a Villainous Friendship with Scarpine and Dr. Mortner, the only two members of his entourage not to be Killed to Uphold the Masquerade.
Well... it's official. The villain in Twilight's Kingdom is going to be discussed soon especially now that it looks like it's Tirek from the picture revealed. Should we just vote to cut all examples of this new villain right now, since because of the show's themes, it can't have a Complete Monster even if Tirek were to return? Have we already gone over him? If not, now would be a good time to start. Also, he escaped from Tartarus, the pony version of hell, so people are going to assume he's pure evil based on that.
I really wish we could just trim the fat for those MLP darkfic examples, many of them look too silly to be played seriously especially all those fics where the Mane Six are irredeemable assholes. I just can't take Cupcakes or Rainbow Factory seriously.
No. It is really frigging unlikely that he will qualify, but I think we made a mistake (albeit a useful one) in saying that it is flat-out impossible for the show to ever have an example.
To a Pony darkfic purge. "They're so dark they're inherently ridiculous" is what I've always believed.
Tentative on Marissa. Her nature as a Well-Intentioned Extremist seems to be a plausible interpretation of her actions, so I would support a cut unless we can confirm that her moral conflict is really just an act.
on Rat King.
Any other thoughts on Stanley from Cabin by the Lake and the Freddy vs. Jason examples? Stanley has received one upvote so far.
I went over Monster.Film, and there are issues with some Bond examples.
I believe it was determined pretty early on in this thread that Affably Evil (unlike Faux Affably Evil, where it's just an act) is mutally exclusive with Complete Monster as it's a redeeming trait, so he can't be both. The film page also lists him under this trope, but I doubt if his friendliness is at all genuine given how brutal he can be at other times.
Max Zorin could use a better write-up. Here's his previous entry:
And a new one:
I think I've asked this before, but would it be an idea to create a Monster/JamesBond franchise page? There are at least seven film examples and probably more from the novels.
And speaking of animated shows, it's been a very long time since I've last seen it, but would Dr. X, the Big Bad from the 2000s Action Man series qualify for this trope? Despite his Obviously Evil portrayal and that of his League of Doom, for a kid's show he's played awfully straight as an Evilutionary Biologist who only advocates genocide and enslavement, takes over someone's body through mind control and tries to kill innocents in virtually every one of his appearances. I don't think he can even be called a Well-Intentioned Extremist who believes his dream of some sort of post-human super race is ultimately for the betterment of mankind. By the final episode he's closer to an Omnicidal Maniac as he tries to annihilate all of mankind by colliding the Earth with a comet, and as a newly born cyborg neo-human he sees only himself as the pinnacle of perfection and the future of "mankind", apparently only caring about his own survival. He outranks any of his minions in evil, with one even performing a Heel–Face Turn to stop him (although for pragmatic reasons).
edited 3rd May '14 10:45:01 AM by Morgenthaler
You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"