Petition to rename the term "Jossed" (Second crowner 18 April 2021): Jossed

I meant if that's something else to vote on. Right now there's only one crowner option but it's pretty high consensus.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.

If you wanted to really remove off-page wicks, you'd propose for it to become Flame Bait, but I don't think that's needed in this case. Crowner has nearly a 20:1 ratio right now, after less than a day.

Edited by crazysamaritan on Apr 14th 2021 at 9:55:47 AM

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.

I'm fine with allowing wicks on WMG pages. Even though I rarely read WMG pages (at least these days), I've still probably seen more Jossed wicks on WMG subpages than on Trivia subpages.

Edit: I checked and 1,677 wicks out of 3,499 are on WMG subpages, so making this definition-only would leave 1,822 to go through.

Another edit: 825 wicks are on Trivia subpages, so I guess this really is linked to more often on WMG subpages than Trivia subpages.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 14th 2021 at 6:22:24 AM

You can't always get what you want.

We'd have to clean the Trivia wicks, right? Not voting against definition-only, just wanna know what the course of action will be.

I'm pretty sure we are. I posted the wick counts for WMG and Trivia subpages partially for reference purposes (since a large amount of wicks are already on WMG subpages, and because I thought it was decided that we're keeping those wicks if we make this definition-only), and partially because I had a hunch that there were more WMG wicks than Trivia wicks.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 15th 2021 at 10:09:36 AM

You can't always get what you want.

If it's just a wick, it can stay. We'd be removing examples.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.

As I've argued before, most of the Trivia wicks are, strictly speaking, Audience Reactions. These which discuss a specific fanwork can be put under Outdated by Canon.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Could it be moved to YMMV even if it's definition-only?

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.

If we're going to limit this to inline wicks instead of full-fledged examples, I don't see a reason to classify this as Trivia or YMMV, though that would probably require another crowner (and if it matters, the mods have said Fetish Fuel is staying on Audience Reactions despite being definition-only).

Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 16th 2021 at 7:09:37 AM

You can't always get what you want.

As I previously mentioned, 1,677 wicks out of 3,499 are on WMG subpages, so there are a lot of pages that can be skipped during wick cleanup. We'd mainly be looking at the Trivia/ and Creator/ namespaces for standalone examples (though I'd imagine Joss Whedon's page has him listed as the trope namer, so that wick can stay).

You can't always get what you want.

Yes, it could. This would mean that main page wicks would not be allowed. It would need another crowner to determine.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.

Depends what "it" is. Examples can't be moved.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

That was saying the article itself could be moved to be a YMMV-trope.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.

I took care of the A wicks in the Trivia/ namespace. A couple of wicks were just referencing the term, so I kept them, and some pages had to be cutlisted because there were no other examples.

Hold on a bit and I'll get a crowner before we decide whether this stays in Trivia.

Edit: Here it is.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 18th 2021 at 5:11:20 AM

You can't always get what you want.

Attached it and voted. In favour of moving to YMMV - functionally "fandom theory is refuted by author" is more akin to YMMV due to the "fan theory" aspect, unless the author specifically discusses a fan theory but most usages of the term don't.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

If this becomes YMMV instead of Trivia, what would that mean for inline Trivia/ wicks (such as the ones I previously left alone), since What Goes Where on the Wiki says YMMV wicks mainly go on YMMV pages (aside from in-universe examples)? I'm aware that inline wicks on YMMV pages (which would probably mainly be in examples for speculation-based YMMV items) would be able to stay.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 21st 2021 at 2:30:11 PM

You can't always get what you want.

It would mean that it cannot be linked on the main work page.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.

(Shit, what did Joss Whedon do?)

mwop

Despite what the person who created the thread believes, we wouldn't change the name just cuz the trope namer's problematic, and I don't think we're changing the name anymore anyway.

Edited by mightymewtron on Apr 21st 2021 at 11:13:18 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.

It's been 12 days and only one option is within consensus range, and it also has the most votes. Is it safe to call?

You can't always get what you want.

Oh yeah, we can call this one.

Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

Index move done. Now, time to deal with Trivia and work page wicks.

Not posting the number as we can skip quite a few, but here's the link anyways.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report

I've handled the Characters/ pages wicks and ignored the Main/ ones as I don't think we need to change these. That said, it seems like many links on work pages are actually about story interpretations being clarified (I've replaced these with "disproved") or about commentary on fan concepts (which I've deleted as fanon shouldn't be discussed on the main pages)

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman