Hello and welcome! This here thread is a spoiler-free zone!
Things that are acceptable here:
- Trailers and trailer speculation
- Discussion of Star Wars movies and shows, and what we would like to see/not like to see in them.
- Discussion about anything and everything Star Wars, just...no spoilers.
Things that are not-acceptable here:
- Spoilers! No talking about the leaks!
- Being mean! If you disagree with someone's opinion, try not to come across as mean or rude.
And here. we. go.
Things that are acceptable here:
- Trailers and trailer speculation
- Discussion of the Star Wars movies and what we would like to see/not like to see in them.
- Discussion about anything and everything Star Wars, just...no spoilers.
Things that are not-acceptable here:
- Spoilers! No talking about the leaks!
- Being mean! If you disagree with someone's opinion, try not to come across as mean or rude.
And here. we. go.
Rise of Skywalker Final Trailer:
Mr. Sunday's Ten Easy To Miss Details in Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (Final Trailer Breakdown):
This cool mashup of Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker and Avengers: Endgame trailers:
And also here's a trailer for The Mandalorian:
Edited by Mrph1 on Aug 31st 2024 at 8:23:29 PM
Okay, here's the problem - you're arguing that it makes total sense "within the story".
Which doesn't really have anything to do with my argument of "They shouldn't have done this in the first place". I'm not arguing that Han turning back to smuggling out grief is completely unrealistic, I disagree with the writers doing this in the first place.
Something making sense within the story doesn't make something a good decision from a meta decision.
And ultimately, the sequels engaged in the tired sequel habit of tearing down the previous generation to prop up the new one, which kinda turns Disney's claim that the movies would be a "passing of the torch" into false advertising.
Nevermind that the new generation doesn't come out of the whole thing looking that good either.
I think this will always be the main thing holding back the sequels compared to the other trilogies in the long run: The fact that they basically went scorched earth on the setting to mimic what we've already experienced.
We learn from history that we do not learn from historyHot take, but I think Star Wars would benefit from focusing on the Sith and Dark Side of the Force more in the main projects in the future.
Like all the stuff featuring them like the Vader comics have been well received.
"The Black Rage makes us strong, because we must resist its temptations every day of our lives or be forever damned!"A Sith movie shouldn't glamorize the Sith or focus on the cool Force powers.
They should be more like American Psycho. Show enough of a Sith's thought processes to really highlight what a fucked up person a Sith is.
Disgusted, but not surprised![]()
Yeah, those are the best types of Sith stories.
Initially present them as cool and better than those lame Jedi, then gradually show that their ideology is just a pretty terrible and impractical one in the long run, and no Sith is ever truly happy no matter how much UNLMITED POWER they have. And then die horribly.
This is why the Korriban section in KOTOR is one the best Star Wars moments for me personally, and why games like Tyranny are very compelling.
Because they demonstrate the fallacy of evil and how it will fall in perfect detail.
"The Black Rage makes us strong, because we must resist its temptations every day of our lives or be forever damned!"More fanfic ideas expanded by this discussion:
I've previously discussed the one about an errant Apprentice of an errant line of Sith becoming enlightened, ditching the Dark Side (she wasn't that good at it in the first place) and deciding to found her own order of space wizards based on the principles of, well, being a wizard.
Her philosophy consists of "Avoid the madness of the Sith but don't feel like you have to be a monk like the Jedi. Do not try to master the Force, nor allow yourself to be absorbed by Its Will. Master yourself, and master your connection to the Force, and then make your own path in life. Teach others, for it is in teaching that true mastery is attained."
Of course, there is much discussions about:
- "Jedi means something specific, and we're not Jedi. We're just wizards, Magi."
- "We are not Gray Jedi. We haven't balanced Light and Dark within ourselves because there is no such thing as the Light Side. There is the Dark Side and there is not being a lunatic."
- "Jedi make wonderful neighbors but I wouldn't wish being one on anyone. They have achieved a Oneness with the Force, a stillness that is in perfect harmony with the universe. Great for everyone else, but it's a terrible burden to bear. I feel it strips you of something fundamentally sapient."
- "We have to have lightsabers. They're incredibly useful tools, and weapons, if you have the ability to use them, which we do. But more importantly, they're symbols. Nobody will take us seriously without them, just look at the Nightsisters."
Well speakig of Sith, I was just thinking about that there is still one story about Darth Maul that has not been told yet: How he went from the leader of Crimson Dawn to being stranded on Malachor.
We last saw him as leader when he called Qi'ra in 10 BBY and her recent appeariances in the comics have revealed that she received combat training from him and took the organization over when he dissappeared.
Huh.
Filling the remaining gaps of Maul’s story might be a good opportunity to maybe incorporate some of the Lucas version of what the sequel trilogy would have been and tell a new story.
One Strip! One Strip!You are not wrong, HOWEVER, there's actually a decent counterargument here because the story premise isn't that "Han becomes a smuggler again." It's, "Okay, Leia and Han's son becomes a radicalized ISIS/Alt-Right school shooter Neo-Nazi."
Which is a central part of TFA.
You need to show both parents react to that and for it to mean something, it does have to have a massive affect on both.
Him becoming a smuggler again because it destroys him isn't a BAD story even if it's not a FUN story.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jul 7th 2022 at 1:18:08 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.I'm just here to pop up and say: who wants to compare shooting faces among Skywalkers?
I get the impression some of these faces are...conveniently timed snapshots? Like, if you freeze frame at a certain point in a lot of facial expressions you can get something goofy.
But among those picture, obviously Padme, 100%.
Leviticus 19:34It's the nature of the internet, frame by frame analysis until they find something they can poke fun at.
I'm reminded that it's near impossible to think that they didn't cast Daisy Ridley for the express purpose of foreshadowing Rey as being a Skywalker. However you look at it, it's like setting up an alley-oop and deflecting off the rim.
Comics are just words and pictures. You can do anything with words and pictures.

Or maybe they just were not that mad and sent people after him out of obligation, they just knew he would find some way to get out of it
Hail Vox Populi!