This thread will be to list pages whose pics are fine as is but are needing quality upgrades, so we don't take up space in the forum with individual threads for them.
Swapping a pic with a better-quality version is a free action, as is swapping a pic with a larger identical version to fit the new image size criteria (800px minimum width). If there are more changes in the proposed swap (e.g. less text, slightly different coloring or crop), however, you might want to post here first.
Resources:
- Reverse image search engines like Google Image Search
, Tineye
, Yandex
, and Bing
are useful for finding larger-quality versions.
- SauceNAO
can locate artwork sources.
- GIMP
(download), Photopea
, and Photoroom
are good freeware for simple manipulations like increasing brightness or removing backgrounds.
Please add pages that need work to the following Sandbox page: Artifacts 'R' Us
Edited by Synchronicity on Aug 30th 2024 at 1:38:40 PM
If it's objectively better version but still the same image, the discussion is said to not be required. Still never hurts to ask though.
TroperWall / WikiMagic CleanupNever saw it that way, so I guess it's a personal thing.
I'll go swap Young Winston since there's no issue with that. Old pic for record:

![]()
![]()
Can anyone find a better version of Madeleine Madden? I tried but I kept getting "similar but not the same".
The image in Trademark is really bad. Not only is it badly artifacted, it also has an ugly white background with weird highlights at the edge.
Edited by Adept on Oct 2nd 2022 at 1:47:03 AM
Suggestion to update some logos that are hard to see on night mode:


Amazon Studios is yet another example of a transparent page image that you can’t see in Night Vision mode.
You’re Gonna Carry That Weight.





The replacement suggestion above is a straight up quality upgrade that doesn't require any discussion so I question if it needs to be raised here instead of just going through with the upgrade and be done.