#2: May 25th 2019 at 8:41:18 PM
Opened.
rjd1922
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
from the United States
Since: May, 2013
Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
#3: May 25th 2019 at 9:39:36 PM
I say just get rid of the byline altogether:
Edited by rjd1922 on May 25th 2019 at 11:40:58 AM
Keet cleanup
WarJay77
Bonnie's Artistic Cousin
from The Void
(Troper Knight)
Relationship Status: Armed with the Power of Love
#4: May 25th 2019 at 9:41:39 PM
That was my favorite in the suggestion's thread, for the record.
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
#5: May 25th 2019 at 9:49:59 PM
Barring finding a color version of the shield itself without the banner around it, I'm good with that.
Primis
Since: Nov, 2010
#7: May 25th 2019 at 11:45:10 PM
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.
TheUnsquished
Filthy casual
from Southern Limey Land
(Life not ruined yet)
Relationship Status: Married to the job
#8: May 25th 2019 at 11:55:49 PM
I can go with it.
(Annoyed grunt)
Brainulator9
Short-Term Projects herald
from US
Since: Aug, 2018
Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
#9: May 26th 2019 at 4:44:35 AM
Latest suggestion. Night Vision-friendly too.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
Jester_Punslinger
I fight for a "Jest" cause
from Somewhere back in time.
Since: Sep, 2018
Relationship Status: Non-Canon
#10: May 26th 2019 at 6:09:32 AM
The Rosers were red. The Drownies are blue. I know What the Thunder Said. Do you?
miraculous
Goku Black
(Apprentice)
#11: May 26th 2019 at 8:24:07 AM
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
MrScout101
Since: Jan, 2015
#12: May 26th 2019 at 9:28:39 AM
I also suggested a banner-less version as well, but I suppose that this version can also alternatively work.
AmourMitts
Since: Jan, 2016
#13: Jun 1st 2019 at 9:50:45 PM
I can live with 1.3 without a byline.
#14: Jun 2nd 2019 at 3:06:41 PM
Good enough. 3's in and tagged; locking up.
Old pic:
Total posts: 14
The current picture presented on the Warner Bros. article has a byline denoting that the company is owned by Time Warner, which would be fine except for the fact that AT&T bought the company last year and renamed it to WarnerMedia. Not helping matters is the fact that it explicitly states that it is owned by that same company as well. That being said, can someone update the logo picture so it properly says "A Warner Media Company"?
Edited by MrScout101 on May 24th 2019 at 5:56:07 AM