TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Cleanup thread: Magnificent Bastard

Go To

During the investigation of recent hollers in the Complete Monster thread, it's become apparent to the staff that an insular, unfriendly culture has evolved in the Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard threads that is causing problems.

Specific issues include:

  • Overzealous hollers on tropers who come into the threads without being familiar with all the rules and traditions of the tropes. And when they are familiar with said rules and traditions, they get accused (with little evidence) of being ban evaders.
  • A few tropers in the thread habitually engage in snotty, impolite mini-modding. There are also regular complaints about excessive, offtopic "socializing" posts.
  • Many many thread regulars barely post/edit anywhere else, making the threads look like they are divorced from the rest of TV Tropes.
  • Following that, there are often complaints about the threads and their regulars violating wiki rules, such as on indexing, crosswicking, example context and example categorization. Some folks are working on resolving the issues, but...
  • Often moderator action against thread regulars leads to a lot of participants suddenly showing up in the moderation threads to protest and speak on their behalf, like a clique.

It is not a super high level problem, but it has been going on for years and we cannot ignore it any longer. There will be a thread in Wiki Talk to discuss the problem; in the meantime there is a moratorium on further Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard example discussion until we have gotten this sorted out.

Update: The new threads have been made and can be found here:

     Previous post 
IMPORTANT: To avoid a holler to the mods, please see here for the earliest date a work can be discussed, (usually two weeks from the US release), as well as who's reserved discussion.

  • Why do a cleanup?: This trope definitely exists and has a well documented history of use. That being said, it frequently gets misused to a character who meets one of the components, namely that they are smart, charming while not necessarily even being a villain, or create good plans. While these are components, there is also a certain personality required, not to mention that all of the above are required to be present for a character to be a true Magnificent Bastard. As the trope attracts interest, it unfortunately brings in a lot of misuse and I thought the best way to rectify this would be a Perpetual Cleanup Thread, as is being done and has seen success with Complete Monster.

  • What makes a Magnificent Bastard: Below is a list of the individual components to make this character. Note that they must all be present, not just some, which has lead to frequent misuse:
    • Must be intelligent: Goes without saying, to be a Magnificent Bastard, the character has to be smart in the first place and use their brain to work towards whatever their end goal may be;
    • Must be a Bastard: While going overboard in how vile the character is can be detrimental, a key aspect is the Bastard part of the trope, whether the character is an out-and-out antagonist in the work, some manner of Villain Protagonist, or something in between, they at least have some unscrupulous qualities to qualify for this trope;
    • Must not be too detestable: Again, there is a ceiling on how bad the character can be before they just become too nefarious, blocking out the Magnificent part of the trope. A genocidal racist or child-raping Sadist aren't going to make the cut;
    • Think on their feet: In addition to being a Chessmaster, a Magnificent Bastard, if the character deals with situations in which their initial plan is ruined, has to be able to pull a Xanatos Speed Chess and at least come up with a competent strategy to make up for lost time, otherwise they fail for being unable to think in tough spots;
    • Have charm: Even if they don't necessarily make every character they meet fall in love with them and can even be detested by others, the audience has to find an amicable social relation to the character, or they are failing to make the impact required for this trope.

  • What to do if a character is listed on a page but has not been approved?: They need to be removed, all candidates need to come through the cleanup thread first. The character could well count but they need to be analyzed properly and voted on first.

  • Do we list Playing With this trope?: No; as a YMMV trope, this cannot be Played With, so we only want examples that are Played Straight.

  • What do I do if I want a character to be listed as a Magnificent Bastard?: The greatest success Complete Monster saw for its cleanup effort was from the invention of the effort post format, so, borrowing from that, a troper wishing to propose a Magnificent Bastard will create such a post in the following format:
    • Begin by describing The work, this will help establish the setting the character is in and for the reader to understand what kind of a scenario they are in;
    • Summarize The character's actions, this will provide a listing for readers to understand what they do and how it applies to this trope because charm and lack of smugness are so crucial, this is a good time to be incorporating exactly the flavor of how they operate to explain this;
    • List circumstances in which the character must Think on their feet, these are times where a wrench might be thrown in their initial plan and they have to adapt on the spot or even come up with a new scheme all together, this is also a good time to explain how the villain reacts to defeat when they have to face it, a true Magnificent Bastard won't break down into tears at the thought of death, they should have known such a possibility could occur and be able to handle it with more dignity;
    • The competition, similar to the Heinous Standard dealt with for a Complete Monster, this section is to deal with how successful the character is in carrying out their plans compared to other characters. While, as a villain, they probably are going to lose in the end, it is good to explain how other characters handle the same situation. There is no exceptionalism case to be made for this trope but explaining the variety helps the reader have a better understanding of the proposal.

  • How do you know when the character's arc is done so they can be proposed? When their tenure as a villain or antagonist finishes. This could happen in a single Story Arc in an entire work, a single work of a franchise, or the whole series in general. We'll show lenience to Long-Runners with constantly recurring candidates or series with outstanding continuities (ex. comic books), and it's entirely possible to count in a work or two but not in general for a reason like Depending on the Writer.

  • What about candidates evil because of external sources? Those Made of Evil can qualify if they show enough individuality and tactical acumen — in other words, they have the personality to fulfill the magnificence requirement. Conversely, those brainwashed, especially if they're a better person without it, may fail the individuality aspect and cannot count.

  • What if they are under orders from a higher-up? Depends. If the boss created the plans down to the letter and the candidate is just following them, sounds like we should discuss the boss instead. However, if the candidate takes creative liberties with the orders, adds their own charm and flair to them, fills in holes in the orders, and/or actively deals with obstacles their boss did not talk about, the candidate shows enough individual thinking to qualify.

  • What about Character Development? An MB is something a character can develop into... a nice person who plots well might become more morally gray as the work goes on and hits the "Bastard" criteria, thus making them viable. Likewise, a Smug Snake might shed their ego, become more understanding of the threat others pose and gain the personality or "Magnificent" criteria, likewise making them viable. Conversely, a character who looks like this trope might suffer from a Sanity Slippage or just get outed as not being as smart as they thought they were and become incompatible with MB.

  • Can an MB be a good guy? Not in the conventional sense... it is required they have at least some dubious traits lest they fail the "Bastard" criteria. That being said, a character who pulls a Heel–Face Turn or eventually stops taking villainous actions is still fair game: as there was a point in time where they were both "Magnificent" and a "Bastard" at the same time and they've merely adapted as time goes on. Now... if such a character begins showing other issues (i.e.: becomes prone to freak outs or starts getting outwitted) then they're compromising their Magnificence and will probably be deemed a cut. What's important is stylishly operating while at least for some time being willing to take at best underhanded methods to see a job done. A Heel–Face Turn in itself isn't a disqualifier but they do have to have been "Magnificent" and a "Bastard" at the same time and afterwards can't start slipping on the former front.

  • What about characters whose stories can take different routes?: When proposing a character in a form of media that has them in multiple story routes. Said character must be consistent with their characteristics in all routes. (ex.: Can't have an example who shows promise on one route yet fails in another.) The only exception is if a later installment of the series confirms the character's actions which made them worth proposing are the canon route.

  • Is there a timeframe rule like with Complete Monster?: Yes, please wait two weeks until after the work has concluded before proposing a character (again, usually using the North American air date). As is the case with CM, we want to give a reasonable time frame so that everyone interested in seeing the work has done so and can participate in the discussion without having anything spoiled.

  • What about groups like with Complete Monster?: This is a point of divergence between the two tropes. While CM does not allow for a single entry encompassing more than three characters lest their heinousness for crimes becomes too watered down, with MB as long as they are treated as one "unit" it is acceptable to lump all characters provided they share acts of charm and intelligence.

  • Can I propose my own work's character as a Magnificent Bastard?: No, this is a YMMV subject and the creator of a content is way too biased to be able to evaluate the criteria we're looking for without a second opinion taking over. That being said, you are more than welcome to encourage someone to consume your creation and if they feel a character counts, are more than welcome to suggest them.

Thread rules

When voting a troper must specify the effort post they're voting on and cannot merely vote on "Everything I missed" as in the past it has indicated the poster didn't read the effort post and is guessing instead of analyzing.

Resolved items

In general, a character listed on this trope is considered "settled". This means they should not be challenged unless information used to list them was incorrect or information was missed in the initial discussion.

However, when re-litigating a candidate, the same rules apply for when they were originally proposed. If they do not have five or more upvotes than downvotes for approval upon a re-litigation, including votes from the initial discussion if they do not change, then they are a cut.

This especially applies to the characters listed below, who have been discussed excessively and repeated attempts to get them listed/cut may result in punitive action for bogging down the thread.

Definitely an MB

Definitely not an MB

  • South Park: The show's frequent use of vulgar comedy and mean-spirited humor leaves any potential candidates devoid of the dignity or charm to qualify.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 31st 2023 at 4:15:22 AM

papyru30 from Colorado for summer break Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
#17476: Apr 18th 2020 at 6:46:39 PM

Didn't we already discuss her last year? I'll abstain until I get confirmation on this. Also happy 700 page!

Edited by papyru30 on Apr 18th 2020 at 7:47:10 AM

k410ren Since: Jan, 2016
#17477: Apr 18th 2020 at 6:47:33 PM

I didn’t seem to have found it.

And it does look like we have reached 700 pages.

Well, here’s to us”.

Edited by k410ren on Apr 18th 2020 at 9:48:19 AM

"I'll show you the Dark Side." CM actors and kills
G-Editor The 47th President Since: Mar, 2015 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
The 47th President
#17478: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:00:05 PM

Happy 700 pages everyone! Only three hundred more to go and we’ll reach a thousand

My sandbox of EPs and other stuff
k410ren Since: Jan, 2016
#17479: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:00:38 PM

[up][up][up]Well, it looks like some of the problems people had was her having a mini-breakdown or two during the climax of the film. One of those was Stitches pressing her Berserk Button of calling her "Daddy's Little Girl", which didn't show up at any point earlier, and the way she acts is actually toned down to how she usually does with Stitches; she generally finds him annoying and responds by choking him, with Stiches crying out "Uncle! Uncle! Uncle!"

Edited by k410ren on Apr 18th 2020 at 10:06:31 AM

"I'll show you the Dark Side." CM actors and kills
SkyCat32 The Draftsman of Doom (Five Year Plan) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
The Draftsman of Doom
#17480: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:05:06 PM

I remember she was voted down, can't find the EP.

Happy 700, btw.

[down] Thanks. I was one of the naysayers, evidently.

My "no" stands, by the way.

Edited by SkyCat32 on Apr 18th 2020 at 10:27:04 AM

43110 (Striking Back) Relationship Status: Reincarnated romance
#17481: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:07:36 PM

We did, ultimately decided she was too childish and whiney for this trope, in spite of all her planning.

Right here is where she was brought up last time.

Edited by 43110 on Apr 18th 2020 at 10:09:40 AM

jjjj2 from Arrakis Since: Jul, 2015
#17482: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:13:01 PM

I think most of us abstained from her, and I'm keeping that abstention.

You can only write so much in your forum signature. It's not fair that I want to write a piece of writing yet it will cut me off in the mid
43110 (Striking Back) Relationship Status: Reincarnated romance
#17483: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:15:07 PM

I think that one might have been more of a negative lean than neutral. Regardless, I'm sticking by my feeling that her freak outs are too frequent and sticking with the no I gave last time.

papyru30 from Colorado for summer break Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
jjjj2 from Arrakis Since: Jul, 2015
#17485: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:28:21 PM

That is the nature of this thread and the Complete Monster thread. We must have 5+50%/50% in order to count thus if you're on the cusp of 50/50 that'll be leaning negative. Honestly I think it should be something more like 2/3,1/3 but it hasn't really caused any major problems here. We don't have very large voting pools.

[down][down] I wasn't insinuating you didn't, that was more just me thinking out loud about our voting requirements.

Edited by jjjj2 on Apr 18th 2020 at 11:09:40 AM

You can only write so much in your forum signature. It's not fair that I want to write a piece of writing yet it will cut me off in the mid
username2527 Since: Nov, 2013
#17486: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:29:41 PM

Reading that previous argument, Gwen seems like a "no". Too much of a prima donna.

43110 (Striking Back) Relationship Status: Reincarnated romance
#17487: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:46:06 PM

I know what the voting requirements to get up are. I'm saying as I recall, the last time she was brought up there were more no votes than yes votes... beyond just a 50/50 split or mostly abstains.

[up][up] Oh I didn't think you were, was just clarifying that as I recall it was more no votes than yes.

Edited by 43110 on Apr 18th 2020 at 11:20:32 AM

hittheassassin Since: Jan, 2018 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
#17488: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:48:59 PM

I've found this brief but delicious quote from the Kingpin that could be added to the quote page:

" The best puppeteers never use strings. "
Wilson Fisk/The Kingpin, Spider-Man: The Animated Series

Kylotrope Barb(Its a thread joke you wouldn't get it) from Honolulu Hawaii Since: Apr, 2018
Barb(Its a thread joke you wouldn't get it)
#17489: Apr 18th 2020 at 7:53:51 PM

Happy 700 pages everyone!

Things are really about to get Fun around here
Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
DemonDuckofDoom from Some Pond in Hell Since: Sep, 2015 Relationship Status: Showing feelings of an almost human nature
43110 (Striking Back) Relationship Status: Reincarnated romance
#17492: Apr 18th 2020 at 8:23:07 PM

Happy 700 indeed and sure to the quote there Hit.

papyru30 from Colorado for summer break Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: Yes, I'm alone, but I'm alone and free
jjjj2 from Arrakis Since: Jul, 2015
#17494: Apr 18th 2020 at 8:54:38 PM

Yes happy 700, and that quote is great.

You can only write so much in your forum signature. It's not fair that I want to write a piece of writing yet it will cut me off in the mid
MasterN Berserk Button: misusing Berserk Button from Florida- I mean Unova Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
#17495: Apr 18th 2020 at 9:12:39 PM

I love it too. So simple, yet so perfectly encapsulates the trope despite being only six words long.

If anyone else wants to vote on Justin, here is my EP.

Edited by MasterN on Apr 18th 2020 at 9:15:24 AM

One of these days, all of you will accept me as your supreme overlord.
BigglesTh9 Since: Jul, 2011
#17496: Apr 18th 2020 at 9:49:09 PM

@43110 Are we talking about the Castlevania games or Netflix series? If it's the latter, I have a few thoughts I could share, here or by PM. I know I'm not a regular, but I did a bit of work on the CM thread a while back and think I understand this one just as well.

futuremoviewriter Since: Jun, 2014
#17497: Apr 19th 2020 at 1:05:27 AM

I wasn’t on at the time that Gwen was voted on (October), but in a catch up when I returned (December), I gave her a [tup]. Not that it matters now though.

Edited by futuremoviewriter on Apr 19th 2020 at 1:28:45 AM

43110 (Striking Back) Relationship Status: Reincarnated romance
#17498: Apr 19th 2020 at 5:04:15 AM

@ Biggles, Welcome and if you have thoughts please feel free to PM me on the show!

TellAll111 Since: Jun, 2010
#17499: Apr 19th 2020 at 5:04:26 AM

[tup] for the Kingpin quote.

As for Gwen, I'm of the opinion that more light-hearted and/or comedic media allow for a little more leeway than more dark and/or serious media; that being said, while her plan is a good plan, when her control over the situation unravels, she throws a tantrum as people pointed out. So this one's a [tdown]

GeorgieEnkoom Emperor Georgie Artémis Enkoom Evulz II from Somewhere. Since: Feb, 2017 Relationship Status: 700 wives and 300 concubines
Emperor Georgie Artémis Enkoom Evulz II
#17500: Apr 19th 2020 at 6:06:42 AM

Yes to Justin and the Kingpin quote. As for Gwen... Well, if she regain her composure after each freak-out according to ANewMan, then I'm comfortable keeping my yes to her, even if I doubt she'll go up.

J’m’arrête pas tant qu’j’vois pas des lignes sur les moniteurs (Not stoppin 'til I see Flatlines)

Total posts: 82,595
Top