Since there are threads for Hbomberguy, Shaun and ContraPoints already, it occurred to me to start one for a certain Mr. Xexizy aka Muke. This is not because I agree with things he says, but because I find his videos interesting and am just as interested to see what people think about him.
Just like with any other thread about any other political Youtuber, I want to repeat the usual request (in a slightly less usual form perhaps) that anyone commenting avoids flame-warring, mudslinging, name-calling, drama-mongering, malicious trolling, digs, jabs, shots, overt or passive-aggressive provocation and confrontation that crosses the line over to snideness/hostility/vitriol/non-benign sarcasm. If you want to joke around a bit or even do a bit of some sarcastic or ironic humour, then please keep it non-insulting and non-provocative. No matter how wrong it seems another commenter may be or how controversial an idea is, I'd like to believe we can have civil discussion and even challenge each other, confront faulty and/or in-bad-faith argumentation and scrutinize merits of ideas without devolving to insults, hostility, schisms, heat and going in circles. I'd hate to see mods locking this thread.
So the usual in short: Please stay civil, no matter how what you think of the star of this show or his ideas ("his" ideas anyway) - even if you are all the way against everything he says.
So yes, in case it's unclear, I'm actually expecting detailed rebuttals of Xexizy's ideas, too.
Now would the more theoretically seasoned please step in?
Since there are threads for Hbomberguy, Shaun and ContraPoints already, it occurred to me to start one for a certain Mr. Xexizy
aka Muke
. This is not because I agree with things he says, but because I find his videos interesting and am just as interested to see what people think about him.
Just like with any other thread about any other political Youtuber, I want to repeat the usual request (in a slightly less usual form perhaps) that anyone commenting avoids flame-warring, mudslinging, name-calling, drama-mongering, malicious trolling, digs, jabs, shots, overt or passive-aggressive provocation and confrontation that crosses the line over to snideness/hostility/vitriol/non-benign sarcasm. If you want to joke around a bit or even do a bit of some sarcastic or ironic humour, then please keep it non-insulting and non-provocative. No matter how wrong it seems another commenter may be or how controversial an idea is, I'd like to believe we can have civil discussion and even challenge each other, confront faulty and/or in-bad-faith argumentation and scrutinize merits of ideas without devolving to insults, hostility, schisms, heat and going in circles. I'd hate to see mods locking this thread.
So the usual in short: Please stay civil, no matter how what you think of the star of this show or his ideas ("his" ideas anyway) - even if you are all the way against everything he says.
So yes, in case it's unclear, I'm actually expecting detailed rebuttals of Xexizy's ideas, too.
Now would the more theoretically seasoned please step in?
edited 27th Mar '18 9:40:41 AM by MerryMikael