It's pretty good, but it does seem a little over-long and I'm wondering if we could condense it, or if some of it might be better on an Analysis page.
Working on: Author Appeal | Sandbox | Troper WallI think the description was being rewritten at Sandbox.Celebrity Paradox.
Yeah, that needs a little more work. The "It's important to note that, if actor-as-character-X exists in both Work X and Work Y, then it is not an example of this trope" bit must be clearer much earlier, for example.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDoes the "celebrity" actually have to be a person?
(Most obviously, Doctor Who has to be set in a universe where a police box is just a police box, whereas in real life most Britons would recognise it as the TARDIS. This example is currently listed on the page.)
2025: the year it all ends?We trope the inverse; "Work X appears in Work X" as Recursive Canon.
I've tried condensing the description at Sandbox2.Celebrity Paradox
Edited by crazysamaritan on Aug 15th 2020 at 10:32:51 AM
Link to TRS threads in project mode here.Hmm... This seems to be falling to the bottom a lot. Why is that?
We did swap the description, but now we need to clean the wicks. Also, the on-page examples need to be cleaned, and some of the subpages, such as Advertising, are small enough to be merged back to the main page.
Edited by LaundryPizza03 on Dec 21st 2020 at 3:58:36 AM
I'm back!I've merged all the subpages with fewer than 10 examples. Should any others be merged as well?
EDIT: Somebody sent CelebrityParadox.Fan Works to the Cut List, arguing that the trope cannot happen in that medium. Should we cutlist CelebrityParadox.Literature for the same reason?
Edited by LaundryPizza03 on Dec 24th 2020 at 5:53:11 AM
I'm back!
Crown Description:
What would be the best way to fix the page?

The sandbox description looks good enough to swap in
Macron's notes