edited to add this information, since this is going to be a long clean-up
"Donald Trump, as with any other current political figure, should not be a subject of any trope example on the wiki, except:
- When the work in question specifically mentions the RL individual.
- When the entirety of the example has to do with the portrayal of that individual in the work.
- When the work is fictional.
All three of these must apply.
Alternatively:
- When the RL individual has a creative role themselves, such as writing or acting in a work. In this sense we give them no more nor less treatment then we would any other creator.
Additionally, please make sure to take out any examples of "Funny Aneurysm" Moment, Harsher in Hindsight, or Hilarious in Hindsight regarding these political figures. A political event that may be seen positively by some people may be seen negatively by others.
We're starting with the wicks to Donald Trump (There were 751 of them at the starting point of this count.)
Wicks have already been checked and cleared up to
2/14/17 Inherent in the System
Given the current political climate, talking about Donald Trump on this Wiki is a very sensitive topic and pretty much any comment on him could easily end up violating the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment. I talked it over on Ask a Troper and a moderator gave me permission to start this topic. I feel it will be necessary to make sure any mention of him is safe and avoids politically charged or biased opinions. Right now, we need to stick to facts, not opinions.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Jul 27th 2020 at 2:06:58 AM
Yes, it's saying President Trump is engaging in criminal behavior. Clearly that isn't written from even close to a neutral perspective; it needs a cut.
Oooooh lordy lordy lordy that's bad. It doesn't follow the 3 criteria in the pinned comment, there's no citation for the "many political experts" claim, and the grammar is horrendous. I'd say cut it.
Hey how you doing well I'm doing just fine I lied I'm dying insideCut it. Why do we even have that page?
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!If you feel it should be NRLEP, you're free to request that.
I had a dog-themed avatar before it was cool.Problem is, there was already a vote to make it NRLEP and they kept the page. I didn't vote in it, but I don't want to relitigate this when I feel consensus has been reached.
Or maybe things have changed. I'm a firm believer that consensus can change.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Consensus can change, but to me it seems an obvious case of keeping real life examples. RL doesn't necessarily mean politics; other RL examples are mostly fine.
Found this under Egging’s Real Life folder:
- In March 2019, Australian neo-Nazi politician Fraser Anning had an egg thrown at his head by Melbourne teenager William Connolly over Anning's controversial statements on the Mosque shootings in Christchurch, New Zealand, the previous day; Anning responded by punching Connolly in the face twice. The public sided with Connolly, who dubbed him "Eggboy", with a petition for Anning's expulsion reaching over a million signatures in just 72 hours. Anning was thrown out of parliament in the following election two months later.
I’m not really sure about this one... what do you guys think?
Edited by PlasmaPower on Jan 25th 2020 at 10:22:19 AM
Thomas fans needed! Come join me in the the show's cleanup thread!It's generally not a good idea to be referring to present day right-wing politicians as Nazis.
OK. We all know how the Trump impeachment will end at this stage. Therefore, I'm seriously considering an objective-POV So Bad, It's Horrible entry for the impeachment trial. The fact is, there was just too damn much hyper-partisanship on both sides of the issue, and since everyone knew the outcome even before the articles were submitted in the first place you're probably hearing the Eight Deadly Words coming from both sides of the aisle.
Isn't that NRLEP?
No. Don't you even dare.
Are you trollin', bro?
Edited by CustardAndPie on Feb 1st 2020 at 12:55:11 PM
Hey how you doing well I'm doing just fine I lied I'm dying insideLook, I get it, Ryan. Bluntly, both sides of the US political spectrum (I'm Canadian) make me only slightly more thankful that my country has less divisive politics. I know that regardless of what political viewpoint you take, you feel like both the Republicans and Democrats are off the rails. That said, you do not want to provoke people on either side by listing this impeachment in the Horrible subpages.
Rawr.And, as I said, It's unrelated to this wiki. It's not a work we can analyze- it isn't something we can trope. It just doesn't belong, no matter how objective or inoffensive you can make it.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessNO, GOD! NO, GOD! PLEASE, NO! NO! NO! NOOOOO!
First off, as War Jay explained, So Bad, It's Horrible is for FICTIONAL works. The impeachment trial does not fit. Again, read the rules- the work must be fictional in order for the edit to be considered acceptable. Aside from that, it will obviously provoke a lot of people, since it is a hot-button issue. Not a good idea. Just please, reconsider this.
(And this is coming from a centrist who disapproves of both major parties and partisanship in general, mind you.)
Edited by MasterN on Feb 2nd 2020 at 8:16:57 AM
One of these days, all of you will accept me as your supreme overlord.,: Apparently it's not on the NRLEP list for whatever reason. In fact, the page even says "some Real Life examples can be found on...", linking to two other Darth Wiki pages and a trope subpage. That may imply that Real Life examples are allowed. (I'm heading over to the Real Life thread to fix that.)
It refers to other tropes these examples can go to, but there's no RL section.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessYeah, and there's no comic books section on Blaxploitation Parody. Does that mean comic books are banned from having it as a trope?
Horrible.Other is full of examples that are not works of fiction, such as vanity plates, household appliances, conventions, and, ultimately, a miscellaneous section for the miscellaneous section. Talk about Up To Eleven.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!True, true.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessHow would this redundant miscellaneous section be removed, though?
I had a dog-themed avatar before it was cool.Guys, we should take the Other section issue to the actual SBIH thread in LT/P.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessAlright, what do you guys think we should do with the Egging example I brought up? Would making it more neutral suffice?
Edited by PlasmaPower on Feb 2nd 2020 at 2:41:48 PM
Thomas fans needed! Come join me in the the show's cleanup thread!
This is on RefugeInAudacity.Real Life. I want to make sure if this can stay or needs to be cut.