According to The Other Wiki, Bandai Namco Holdings was the parent company for Bandai Namco Studios (developers) and Namco Bandai Games (distributors) until 2014, when the distributors were renamed to Bandai Namco Entertainment.
Presumably our article was named for the distributors. It probably should have been named for the studios. (Since it's a creator page.) And in any case, should definitely be renamed now.
Not really a repair shop issue, though.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Ah, gotcha. A natural mistake. Trope naming issue do come here, but this isn't a trope.
For work and creator pages, we always want the correct name. So renaming them to correct errors is a free action, just as Work Pages Are A Free Launch.
edited 15th Jan '17 11:36:56 PM by Xtifr
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.For the basic page move, I strongly recommend reading How To Move A Page. There's a little more involved than just cutting and pasting the main page. Not a lot, but there's a few things you at least need to check.
As for the wicks? Hmm. Ordinarily, the answer is yes, all the wicks should be updated. But in the case where a company changes its name? Older works may be labeled with the older name, so suddenly I'm not so sure. Our default policy is intended to cover renamed tropes and actual errors in work/creator names. This isn't an error....
Honestly, I'd like a second opinion about the wicks. Maybe even a third. :)
All pages which do indexing should be updated in any case, though, because of the way indexes work.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Goddamnit Bamco, indeed.
I'm going to lock this since we're evidently done.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer

So why is it Namco Bandai? Shouldn't it be Bandai Namco Games? Hell even the trope image uses Bandai Namco!