Follow TV Tropes
On side note, I'm bit confused why did Spielburg change Hammond in Jurassic Park movie more sympathetic character. I mean, apparently he could identify with whole "show children the dinosaurs" thing, but didn't book make it clear it was all for money and greed?
That's not really a diversity and representation question.
Presumably Spielberg thought having too many asshole human antagonists would detract from the dinosaur action.
I'm with Cinema Sins on that regard: The books don't matter. He's hardly the first person to rewrite a character to better suit their silver screen tastes.
Oh oki, I can ask different jurassic park related question then?
Does anyone else feel like the scene with Hammond being like "I should go instead of you because uh you know" and the dr. Sattler being like "we can discuss sexism when we get back" that if Jurassic Park was new movie released this year, that scene would result in anti sjw folks to be like "Sexism existing was mentioned, this movie is now too SJW"?
Umm, or wait, is that question still off topic? Well its still kinda depressing. But yeah, I think lot of classic movies would get tons of dumb complaints if they were released today
Edited by SpookyMask on Mar 6th 2019 at 12:49:14 PM
Oh the anti-SJW crowd would definitely have flipped their shit over that.
Even in the 90s, that bit seemed very gratuitous to me.
Well even if you thought it was unnecessary, it wouldn't have been enough big deal to make it years lasting internet argument
Edited by SpookyMask on Mar 6th 2019 at 3:06:59 PM
So Freeform has an upcoming alternate history series called Motherland: Fort Salem and well...
So what do you guys think are the chances of this not being ridiculously tone deaf?
Problem 1: there was no US government 300 years ago. Idiots.
It's Bright all over again...
alternate America,which possible means it was founded a lot sooner in their timeline
Bit quick to label as a Bright alike
Edited by Ultimatum on Mar 6th 2019 at 4:44:48 PM
Sorry for jumping to conclusions.
I mean, it's not saying that there was America 300 years ago. Just that the point of divergence is 300 years ago. It's like if I said "set in an Alternate America where Christopher Columbus wasn't an asshole and actually made peace with Natives in 1492" (yes, I'm aware that's a less believable premise than witches being real and non-persecuted) is it's not claiming that America was around in 1492, just that the point of divergence was then.
Edited by Larkmarn on Mar 6th 2019 at 11:49:56 AM
No need to apologise!
Edited by Ultimatum on Mar 6th 2019 at 4:51:10 PM
There's also the issue that witches as they're protrayed never existed.
So it's less of an alternative history and mjore "It's completely fiction because the scenario would be aboslutely impossible."
Alternate history fans have a term for that: Alien Space Bats.
Though that synopsis does seem poorly worded all around. "This totally could have happened if one small thing had been different!" I guess you could argue that it's sorta in-universe, but it's still weird.
Not to mention that it's perpetuating the myth that there were witches in Salem who got persecuted. There were no witches, by any definition of the word, just townspeople accusing each other.
Warner Bros. boss offered film roles to actress in exchange for sex.
Guess who was also involved in the whole scheme?note Brett Ratner, of course
Edited by Mario1995 on Mar 6th 2019 at 5:30:59 AM
What a disgusting pig. M84's signature applies yet again.
Hah, I didn't notice this. USA as a nation didn't even exist, thought the colonies did and the trials were actually 400 years ago. So is a double wording error.
For the record, the US will be 243 this July. I figured they just rounded up to 250 for brevity's sake, and then rounded up again for the heck of it.
It might not even be that, we might be reading it wrong. A lot of Alternate History works have a "In a alternate [country] where [stuff happenned differently]" intro.
Basically what Lanmark said.
Edited by KazuyaProta on Mar 6th 2019 at 6:26:29 AM
Huh, makes me realize again I might be alive for the tricentennial
There’s bound to be sources for the history of the first two and it will be interesting to compare
x7 An ugly reminder that the Casting Couch is still a thing. Blech.
"Rape Day" will not be released on Steam. Couldn't figure out how to post Valve's announcement directly, but that article has the announcement quoted in its entirety.
Besides, the official announcement just has a bunch of comments from people blaming SJWs for ruining everything despite admitting they never had any interest in playing this game.
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?