Follow TV Tropes

Following

The Biology, Agriculture, and Paleontology thread

Go To

Wyldchyld (Old as dirt)
#751: Aug 31st 2018 at 11:15:12 AM

[awesome] You win.

Edit: Well, that's a way to start a new page.

Edited by Wyldchyld on Aug 31st 2018 at 7:17:30 PM

If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
Millership from Kazakhstan Since: Jan, 2014
#752: Aug 31st 2018 at 11:26:30 AM

A banditry of chickadees.

A pandemonium of parrots.

A deceit of lapwings.

An asylum of loons.

A flamboyance of flamingos.

Spiral out, keep going.
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#753: Aug 31st 2018 at 12:10:43 PM

You guys just reminded me of the term that I "coined" for a group of my made-up race of centauroid Insectoid Aliens: slaught. And that's just for the equivalent of a small pack of wolves; they're called a horde when in a really big swarm on land, and a scourge when such a swarm is in flight.

Yes, that should tell you a lot about what this race is like.

Edited by MarqFJA on Aug 31st 2018 at 10:12:30 PM

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Wyldchyld (Old as dirt)
#754: Sep 8th 2018 at 8:26:12 AM

BirdLife made the following announcement a few days ago:

Spix’s Macaw heads list of first bird extinctions confirmed this decade

In the 2011 animated film Rio, Blu, a captive-raised Spix’s Macaw, arrives in Brazil to mate with the last-known wild member of his species a female named Jewel. But according to our latest paper, Blu was already 11 years too late – Jewel, the last of her kind, likely perished in or around 2000.

Spix’s Macaw Cyanopsitta spixii is one of eight species primed to have their extinctions either confirmed or deemed highly likely, following a new study by BirdLife International. The eight-year study used a new statistical approach to analyse 51 Critically Endangered species, quantifying three factors at once: intensity of threats, timing and reliability of records, and the timing and quantity of search efforts for the species. Five of the eight confirmed or suspected extinctions took place on the South American continent, four of them in Brazil, reflecting the devastating effects of the high rate of deforestation in this part of the world.

“Ninety per cent of bird extinctions in recent centuries have been of species on islands” says Dr Stuart Butchart, BirdLife’s Chief Scientist and lead author on the paper. “However, our results confirm that there is a growing wave of extinctions sweeping across the continents, driven mainly by habitat loss and degradation from unsustainable agriculture and logging”.

Of the eight species, it was recommended that three species should be re-classified as Extinct; the Cryptic Treehunter Cichlocolaptes mazarbarnetti and Alagoas Foliage-gleaner Philydor novaesi, two ovenbirds from North-east Brazil, and Poo-uli Melamprosops phaeosoma, formerly of Hawaii, which has not been seen in the wild since 2004 (the same year the last captive individual died). The data also suggests another four species should be reclassified as Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), a category that indicates that the species is highly likely to be extinct, but further search efforts are required before we can definitively rule it to be Extinct.

These species are New Caledonian Lorikeet Charmosyna diadema (last sighted in 1987), Javan Lapwing Vanellus macropterus (1994), Pernambuco Pygmy-owl Glaucidium mooreorum (2001) and another Brazilian macaw, Glaucous Macaw Anodorhynchus glaucus (1998).

Hope still persists for the Spix’s, however, despite the Brazilian endemic apparently being wiped out in the wild as a result of deforestation and other factors such as the creation of a dam and trapping for wild trade. An estimated population of between 60-80 persists in captivity, hence the suggested classification change to Extinct in the Wild. A lone sighting in 2016 sparked hope the species may persist in the wild, but it is now suspected to be an escapee from captivity. If so, it is sadly highly unlikely this Blu ever found his Jewel.

If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (USA) (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
The Wanderer
#755: Sep 8th 2018 at 10:28:34 AM

The article is slightly misleading, the Spix's macaw has only declared extinct in the wild, but it doesn't make it all that clear.

Edited by rmctagg09 on Sep 8th 2018 at 1:29:01 PM

Eating a Vanilluxe will give you frostbite.
Wyldchyld (Old as dirt)
#756: Sep 8th 2018 at 4:02:45 PM

I thought the article made that point very clear. It's only the headline that's misleading.

If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
Spinosegnosaurus77 Mweheheh from Ontario, Canada Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: All I Want for Christmas is a Girlfriend
danime91 Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#758: Sep 25th 2018 at 10:11:26 AM

So a recent study has shown that glyphosate, a common chemical in weedkillers, is harmful to bees in that it kills off some of their gut microbes, disturbing their microbiomes, making them more susceptible to diseases, and affecting behavior and ability to effectively pollinate. It is strongly suggested to be behind the mass disappearance of honeybees.

Edited by danime91 on Sep 25th 2018 at 10:11:40 AM

KnightofLsama Since: Sep, 2010
#759: Sep 25th 2018 at 2:46:14 PM

[up] I thought they'd already fingered neonicotinoids for that problem.

danime91 Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#760: Sep 25th 2018 at 2:53:00 PM

[up]Yeah, but there's no reason it can't be a multifaceted problem. The study clearly shows that glyphosate has a negative effect on honeybees and can also cause CCD. The EU's ban on neonicotinoids may help slow the disappearance, but glyphosate is still available there. Observing honeybee populations in Europe over the next few years could yield valuable data, if honeybees are still around by then.

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#761: Oct 2nd 2018 at 5:46:23 PM

I noticed that unlike the ICZN, the ICN has provisions (Art. 23.1, 23.3, and 60.11) for hyphenating a specific epithet in a botanical name in certain cases. I like the idea, but out of pure curiosity, does anyone know what is the logic behind this?

Edited by MarqFJA on Oct 2nd 2018 at 4:03:31 PM

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
DeMarquis Who Am I? from Hell, USA Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
Who Am I?
#762: Oct 14th 2018 at 3:53:59 PM

This article provides an alternative point of view. According to these guys, the collapse of bee populations is greatly exaggerated:

"CCD, which lasted for about 3-5 years, is a sudden phenomenon in which the majority of worker bees mysteriously disappear. That problem, which showed up most dramatically in California, abated by 2011. But reporters continue to use the term, erroneously, to describe other health challenges faced by bees since then, including the growing threat of mite infestations."

Edited by DeMarquis on Oct 14th 2018 at 6:54:55 AM

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
Wyldchyld (Old as dirt)
#763: Oct 14th 2018 at 5:00:30 PM

I've only given the article a quick skim, so I'm only posting my first impression. As a result, that could be subject to change once I've had chance to give the article a deeper read and do some research into its claims.

That article seems rather misleading, especially its graphs of 'honey-producing colonies' and numbers of bees. There is massive hive replenishment going on, which has been going on now for years, and those bees get counted in the totals when population studies are done; this means the honeybee populations look stable on paper because the population is being artificially boosted every year. I'm also not seeing what the definition is of a honey-producing hive to explain what the graphs are actually measuring. For example, a hive might be producing honey, but not in a way that makes it commercially-viable. In other words, honey quantity and hive activity is very important to measure, as are colony lifespan, size and strength (re:ability to survive threats).

It's certainly true that there are a range of problems that honeybees are facing, with the mites at the top of the list of threats. It's also true that mainstream media can sometimes get them confused. However, the US report on the rise in honeybee population is actually something the mainstream media did cover at the time the report was released, and the mainstream media has also covered the fact that the scale of CCD appears to have been a temporary problem in the grand scheme of things, that isn't the same level of problem these days.

What interests me, however, is that this article does not discuss why CCD isn't the threat it used to be — beekeepers drastically changed their beekeeping methods, which seemed to mostly solve the problem. What caused CCD is still a mystery, and how exactly the newer beekeeping methods have mitigated that problem is not well understood. It didn't just suddenly 'abate' by 2011, which is what the wording of the article implies; there was active and sustained intervention to try and reverse the problem, and the problem is still occurring — just less frequently than it used to and therefore it's no longer the biggest threat to hive survival (I believe a report for 2017 said that occurrences of CCD among bee farmers had dropped by around 25% compared to 2016, but I will need to double-check that figure).

Edited by Wyldchyld on Oct 14th 2018 at 1:16:50 PM

If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
Spinosegnosaurus77 Mweheheh from Ontario, Canada Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: All I Want for Christmas is a Girlfriend
Wyldchyld (Old as dirt)
#765: Nov 9th 2018 at 3:58:39 PM

I'm glad this is still being researched. I remember when this question first started being asked in earnest in the mid-90s, but I haven't heard much about it in recent years.

If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.
Lymantria Tyrannoraptoran Reptiliomorph from Toronto Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Historians will say we were good friends.
Tyrannoraptoran Reptiliomorph
#766: Nov 11th 2018 at 3:27:36 PM

Has anyone read these two Tetrapod Zoology articles? My personal lists of animals I'd wish were found (ones I agree with Darren Naish on omitted);

Extinct: A feathered sauropodomorph, a definitely feathered non-coelurosaur theropod, a quadrupedal theropod, a quadrupedal carnivorous dinosaur (theropod or otherwise), a flightless pterosaur, any pterosaurs filling various niches now filled by birds (vulture-like scavenger, nectar-eater, etc.), a proto-pterosaur, a long-armed, big-clawed abelisaur, an arboreal non-avian dinosaur.

Extant: An omnnivorous or herbivorous snake, a cold-blooded bird or mammal, a flying non-bat mammal, a bird with functional wingclaws as an adult, more flightless birds in groups without them. They'd all have to be fairly small and unoticeable, so not Bigfoot or modern non-avian dinosaurs or anything.

Edited by Lymantria on Nov 11th 2018 at 6:44:59 AM

Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!
Spinosegnosaurus77 Mweheheh from Ontario, Canada Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: All I Want for Christmas is a Girlfriend
Mweheheh
#767: Nov 11th 2018 at 5:46:10 PM

any pterosaurs filling various niches now filled by birds (vulture-like scavenger, nectar-eater, etc.)

Alcione seems to have been a wing-propelled diver like a penguin or auk. Istiodactylids seem to have been scavengers like you describe.

a proto-pterosaur

Scleromochlus, probably.

an arboreal non-avian dinosaur

Scansoriopterygids.

a cold-blooded bird or mammal

The naked mole rat.

a bird with functional wingclaws as an adult

Old news.

Edited by Spinosegnosaurus77 on Nov 11th 2018 at 8:50:46 AM

Peace is the only battle worth waging.
eagleoftheninth In the name of being honest from the Street without Joy Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
In the name of being honest
#768: Nov 12th 2018 at 5:23:39 PM

World's humpback whale population booming thanks to Australia's Kimberley region

Humpback whales, once hunted around the world to the point that they became so rare that the industry built on their blubber went belly-up, is booming.

The world's largest humpback whale population is particularly strong in Australia's Kimberley, a region that provides ideal and undeveloped calving grounds, researchers say.

Since the whaling stations were closed, humpbacks that visit Western Australia have become the good news story that defies the trend of environmental doom and gloom.

Many travel all the way up Australia's west coast to the remote Kimberley — a region twice the area of the United Kingdom with just 50,000 residents.

So why do whales visit the Kimberley and what threats do they face?

That was a question audience member Ric Kornaus put for the ABC to investigate for our Curious Kimberley series.

Mr Kornaus first visited the Kimberley in the 1980s and enjoyed camping on the remote coast north of the small town of Broome.

Since that time, Broome has become a popular tourist destination and mining and gas projects have been developed along the coast, prompting Mr Kornaus to ask what impact this has had on the whales that visit the Kimberley.

"What is the affect on them, whether their numbers are dropping or static, or what?" he asked.

Back from the brink

Curt Jenner and his wife Micheline started studying humpback whales on the west coast of Australia almost 30 years ago in an effort to find out if they could recover from near annihilation.

Humpback whales had been hunted at an increasing rate in the early 20th century as technology such as faster ships and exploding harpoons were developed, until populations crashed.

"Back in the early '60s this population was declared uneconomic to whale because the population had been decimated to the point that there was probably only about 500 animals left," Mr Jenner said.

But as the first scientists to investigate humpback whale recovery in Western Australia back in 1990, Mr Jenner and his wife found the population recovery was difficult to comprehend, and it has continued growing at an astonishing rate.

"These are the most successful humpback whales, population-wise, of any humpback whale population on the entire planet," Mr Jenner said.

Dr Kelly Waples is a research scientist with the WA Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions, and she says Western Australia's humpback whales lead the world in terms of population recovery.

"It's one of the best recovery stories for these large whales," Dr Waples said.

"It's been estimated that they've been increasing at about 10 per cent per year, which is the maximum rate that a population can recover at."

In the subsequent decades of study, the Jenners have started to piece together why these WA whales have done so well, once again becoming the world's largest population.

Natural nursery

Like most humpback whales around the world, the WA population leads a feast and famine existence.

They spend summer in Antarctic waters, fattening on krill and small fish, and then migrate to the tropics.

It is one of nature's great feats of endurance for the pregnant female humpbacks, travelling north up Australia's west coast to give birth and providing their calves with the milk that is their sole source of sustenance, all without feeding until returning to Antarctica.

The success of WA's humpback whales appears to be a combination of good feeding grounds in Antarctica, coupled with calving grounds in the Kimberley that ease the demands the migration places on mother and calf.

The pygmy blue whale is another species that migrates between Antarctica and the tropics, and Mr Jenner says its comparatively slow recovery highlights the importance of the Kimberley to the humpback's success.

"The pygmy blue whales that we've been studying off the Western Australian coast give birth up in Indonesian waters," Mr Jenner said.

"There's a lot of plastic, there's a lot of ocean pollution, and there's also an enormous amount of shipping traffic which could either be disruptive or potentially quite dangerous for them."

Safety from killers

The Kimberley's lack of the natural predators of whales may also be the secret to the success of WA's humpbacks.

As numbers boomed after human hunting ceased, the numbers of natural predators also increased.

"Both great white sharks and killer whales are predators of humpback whales, in particular the calves," Dr Waples said.

"As we've seen the recovery of humpback whales, we've also seen more killer whales around."

Killer whales have increasingly been seen attacking humpback calves along the WA coast as far north as Exmouth Gulf.

But further north in the Kimberley, humpback calves can be born and grow for their first few weeks unmolested by killer whales.

"By the time a humpback calf is one month old they have almost doubled in weight," Mr Jenner said.

"It goes from an animal that is extremely vulnerable to one that can hold its breath as long as its mum."

This allows humpback whale calves to increase their chances of not falling prey to killer whales as they make their way back south to the Antarctic feeding grounds.

No sign of stopping

Most experts agree that WA's humpback whales are probably close to reaching their natural population levels before human impacts.

But without knowing what the historic population was, and it being nearly 10 years since the last population count was made, there is quite a bit of guesswork involved.

"We think they're getting up close to around carrying capacity, we don't quite know, but it's certainly getting up to reasonable numbers again," Dr Waples said.

What is certain is that so far there is no sign of humpback population growth slowing down.

Cameron Birch has been taking tourists out on the water to look at WA's humpbacks for almost 20 years, first at Coral Bay and now off Broome.

"The population of humpbacks has just increased exponentially," Mr Birch said.

At a time when it can seem that human interaction with the natural environment can only mean bad news, Mr Jenner said the humpback whales of WA are sending us an important message.

"We need to take advantage of this opportunity and understand what these whales are for us," Mr Jenner said.

"They are beacons of good hope and also beacons of good health for the entire ocean."

Echoing hymn of my fellow passerine | Art blog (under construction)
Spinosegnosaurus77 Mweheheh from Ontario, Canada Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: All I Want for Christmas is a Girlfriend
eagleoftheninth In the name of being honest from the Street without Joy Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Kaiseror Since: Jul, 2016
#771: Nov 22nd 2018 at 4:47:17 PM

I didn't even think they could get that big!

Euodiachloris Since: Oct, 2010
#772: Nov 22nd 2018 at 5:59:19 PM

[up]Nor did anybody else.

Looks like mammals(ish) and reptiles(ish) have been exchanging the "big dog on the block" baton for longer and way many more times than we thought.

See, should we mess the world up enough, large dino-like critters might still make a comeback care of Aves. Unless monitors beat them to the punch, of course. winktongue

Edited by Euodiachloris on Nov 22nd 2018 at 2:02:45 PM

Spinosegnosaurus77 Mweheheh from Ontario, Canada Since: May, 2011 Relationship Status: All I Want for Christmas is a Girlfriend
Mweheheh
#773: Nov 22nd 2018 at 6:04:41 PM

[up][up][up] Technically elephants, rhinos, hippos, giraffes, whales, etc. are big therapsids too. tongue

[up] The words you’re looking for are “synapsids” (for mammals & mammalish things) & “sauropsids” (for birds & true reptiles). I feel like crocodilians would have a better chance than monitors, but who knows.

Edited by Spinosegnosaurus77 on Nov 22nd 2018 at 9:05:37 AM

Peace is the only battle worth waging.
eagleoftheninth In the name of being honest from the Street without Joy Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
In the name of being honest
Euodiachloris Since: Oct, 2010
#775: Nov 22nd 2018 at 7:04:51 PM

[up][up]Nope. Meant exactly what I said. Because mammaly-like thingies include us current lot as well the more old school extinctoroonies.

And reptile-like thingies cover a lot of ground, too.


Total posts: 1,840
Top