Seems like "Keep it as is" is the current winner.
Not that it technically matters since somebody had already altered the description to be less like a Take That! to executives without the consensus of this thread.
(I think we should remove the image as well).
We might be able to find an image of an actual Executive Meddling in some works based around production like say Bakuman, or Gekkan Shoujo Nozaki Kun.
But that is something for an image picking thread.
edited 18th Jan '15 9:21:41 AM by Memers
I voted cleanup, but we shouldn't remove all negativity just because it's negative. Saying "This change is considered to have affected the show badly" is negative, but shouldn't be removed as long as it's a clear audience reaction and not a random troper acting without consensus.
2025: the year it all ends?
The "Cleanup description" part was already done, Septimus Heap. Without consensus.
We'd just now need to cleanup the examples.
Should we still try and clean up the examples to clean up the complaining? The first part of the winning votes, that is, to "change the description so that it's less complainy", was done by someone without any consent within this board, so we don't have to worry about doing that.
We don't have to remove the examples outright, as many of them are still technically examples. We just need to alter them to remove their complain-y tone. We might also need to do something about the page picture... (I might start a Image Pickin' thread in the near future).
- Ensure all examples are written in a neutral tone.
- Remove/replace the quote because it's a bit too much of a Take That!.
- Cut down on the description. Like a lot. It's huge and a good chunk of it is probably unnecessary to have.
edited 13th Dec '15 9:32:40 PM by Karxrida
Made a sandbox. Going to trim down the description first.
EDIT: Killed two paragraphs (and a couple potholes) that didn't seem necessary and added a big bolded "Tropes Are Not Bad" disclaimer at the bottom.
edited 1st Jan '16 10:40:53 PM by Karxrida
Crown Description:
What would be the best way to fix the page?

"Keep it as is" seems to be winning, with "clean up the description and examples" in second place.
The latter is already partially done by someone who didn't act on consensus, so I don't know.