It's allowed to make Image Links pages for work pages. Never heard of a contrary rule (Nor a reason for such a rule to exist, for that matter)
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAs long as the images themselves don't break any of the site rules, then I cannot see any reason not to have an Image Links page for a work. Like many things, it's a matter of people choosing to do it.
edited 6th Mar '13 9:21:38 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Splitting the index by works and tropes is a good idea, though.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.Agreed. I'm a bit surprised that it's not an auto-index.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I might be willing to go through the entries and sort out the work's sub-pages, if that could be useful. I like the idea of auto-indexing. That's how Playing With Wiki works, right?
Could somebody make an Image link for Modesty Towel? I don't know how.
Click on this link (regardless of its color) and click the edit button at the top.

I'd like to ask about Image Links Wiki sub-pages. The page states it's for illustrating tropes. Yet lots of them are attached to work's pages as well. Is this allowed? I myself don't know what to think. Some of the images are nice and all and fans may like it, but but does it help anything?
If it's encouraged, then I think there should be two different indexes for wiki links pages - one for work's pages and one for tropes.
edited 6th Mar '13 9:18:05 AM by XFllo