> Why would one of the other Diamonds sabotage Pink's security?
I don't think they did,I feel it's more likely that Pink was offered additional security but for whatever reason decided she didn't need it
> If neither Diamond was involved with the former, why would they cover it up?
i think it's because they don't want admit that they failed to protect her,it makes them look fallible when they have always projected the image of being infallible
have a listen and have a link to my discord serverWell, this is embarrassing. I post something I thought was pretty neat and I come back to see the thread tearing it apart.
I mean, it sounded convincing the first time I read it, especially point G. The fact that Zircon placed so much emphasis on the last question ("And where was her Pearl?") seemed to suggest that the answer to that question would eventually be the key to unveiling the truth. From a storytelling perspective, anyway.
That, and I was pretty intrigued by the last point, that we know a lot about Garnet and Amethyst's backstories, but very little about Pearl's. I honestly hadn't considered that.
IDK. Maybe I'm just gullible.
edited 1st Jun '17 4:19:15 PM by TyeDyeWildebeest
No beer?! But if there's no beer, then there's no beef or beans!My point was basically that the post didn't add much to the discussion: It was mostly the stuff that's been brought up a lot already (the pink diamond on Pearl's space suit, the stuff from the trial) and some considerably weaker evidence (we saw Pearl using a sword chronologically earlier than Rose, Pearl doesn't shapeshift, Pearl looked upset when Eyeball talked about Pink Diamond in front of Steven).
We're assuming that the flashback in "The Answer" was early on in the Rebellion, because it was just Rose and Pearl. By that point Pearl was already a renegade, so she couldn't also be the Pearl Pink Diamond would have been employing at the time of her shattering. The only way for our Pearl to be responsible for Pink being shattered is if she were to impersonate Pink's Pearl (who may be our Pearl's replacement if we assume that our Pearl was originally Pink's Pearl, which is just an assumption,) to get close to Pink, then she would have had to transform into Rose when it actually came time to shatter Pink for Eyeball's eye-witness account to be at all accurate.
It wouldn't be the first time Garnet had been so afraid of what might happen in a vision that she screwed up in trying to prevent it from taking place, especially where Steven's curiosity is involved.
It seemed like she was assuming based on Steven's past actions...even if he says he'll listen, he'd still go.
Rules of the Internet 45. Rule 45 is a lie. Check out my art if you notice.Yesterday Rebecca Sugar did an interview with Verge
, and today she did one with Polygon
. She kind of says similar things in both because they're both mostly about Save the Light.
You know how Steven's TV/VCR sits on the floor in front of his bed? That's based on a summer break from college where Rebecca left a TV from her dorm on the floor of her parents' house, the real Steven plugged it in a hooked up an SNES, and they just left it there and played Link to the Past all summer.
Also, there was an idea for Attack the Light to have a Non-Standard Game Over similar to the one in Far Cry 4: if you kept the prism out of the light and give it to Garnet, the monsters never come out, the credits roll, and you're put down as having 100% Completion.

Garnet: "I saw you come here, I saw Blue Diamond on Earth, I saw her see me and find all of us, I couldn't be here with you!"
Steven:"She took my dad! It's all my fault! I should've listened to you! What are we gonna do, Garnet?"
She didn't tell him, because she didn't want him to go out of curiosity to begin with, and it backfired, by making him even more curious.
edited 1st Jun '17 2:33:57 PM by xanderiskander