I'm just wondering if we actually needed to link to the rulebook, given the content. (Not sure if it was decided previously.)
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.If people want to read the rules they will have no trouble finding the PD Fs via Google.
It wasn't decided on, I just left the links intact from the page.
Liveblog is here: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=7ixhxjqoe9swz1xv4bxgw5h0&page=1
Added it into the sandbox :)
edited 15th May '12 8:03:57 PM by AGroupie
?I remember that thread. Good times, good times.
Jokes aside, I think that if we're treating this as "objectionable content not amounting to cutworthiness", we should probably remove the link to the original rulebook.
edited 15th May '12 8:06:15 PM by Pyrite
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.Are you still working on the page?
Okay, I think I've done about all I can do with the page. I guess now it's up to the P5 to angel or devil it.
The page on the wiki or the work itself? Because the work already got triple devils.
The sandbox page; it's intended to take the place of the current wiki page. It's ready for P5 review.
edited 15th May '12 9:04:26 PM by Willbyr
I have no problem with the sandbox page as currently written. Seems to do just about everything I'd like to see from the page, and more importantly, none of the stuff that the site doesn't need.
Even though my voice doesn't ultimately count, I approve.
Sandbox seems good to me too :)
?The game is enought of a Schmuck Bait without us providing an explicit link to it. If they want it so badly, they can google it.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.I'd say keep it as a locked stub, as it's uniquiviably the worst Pen and Paper Role Playing Game known to man, animal and all forms of alien life.
I don't know for sure, but from what I've heard of it, you could theoretically play it as a combat/adventuring game without using the sex rules at all. I'm not sure why you'd want to (or why you'd want to play it at all, for that matter), but that does seem like it might take it just barely into not-quite-porn land—if the sex can be omitted without ruining the game.
(Assuming a game this bad can meaningfully be called "ruined".)
Now we just need some volunteers to try to play a sex-free game of it...
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.That's what I was intending with the sandbox page.
I like the sandbox page, it's succinct and IMO makes it abundantly clear that we're not supporting the work, just discussing it.
As Picard would say, make it so.
Visit my contributor page to assist with the "I Like The Cheeses" project!I'm good with the sandbox page. Sorry, Willbyr, work's been busy lately and I didn't get a chance to look at it until just now.
edited 17th May '12 10:25:24 AM by Martello
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.Alright, the move has been made.
I guess we're done now, right?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Seems that way
Visit my contributor page to assist with the "I Like The Cheeses" project!Yup, I think we can lock this one.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.Sweet dreams, little thread.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
@Willbyr: Page looks good to me.
Reaction Image Repository