Follow TV Tropes
It's not cut. You're just missing the namespace. It's Sandbox.What Is Porn.
VisualNovel.Morenatsu was resolved to keep, but page needs to be cleaned up of any gushing and the incorrect shotacon references removed.
Most of the gushing was about Character Development. Anyways, I cleaned most of the pages (There wasn't much to clean), but someone else needs to take care of the images links. I've had too much Bara for one day doing research on a Fanon related item.
Magic Skirt may need some de-creepification.
... Isn't the whole point of that trope to prevent Fanservice? I'll look at it in a couple of hours or so. I have to go to church. (BTW, I think this is the wrong thread for that unless I overlooked something in the P5 subforum.)
edited 3rd Jun '12 11:01:02 AM by encrypted12345
No, it's the right thread.
That was also the point of Innocent Panties. Remember how that turned out?
edited 3rd Jun '12 11:00:59 AM by Iaculus
I see. Sorry for the confusion. I'll work on it later today.
I'm working on it right now and I have a quick question. Is there something wrong about gushing about how frilly the panty shot-covering underskirt is? I get a vague feeling that it is creepy, but in a obsessed about clothes way, not in a way we have to clean. Here's the entry for reference.
About half way into the Video Games section. I just need a small break.
edited 3rd Jun '12 5:18:43 PM by encrypted12345
Are you suggesting that lengthy gushing about clothes is not something we need to clean?
It may not really fall under the view of this particular issue - I wouldn't honestly know - but it doesn't seem like something we want whatever the circumstances.
Is it? I'm honestly not sure. IMO, its's kind of like gushing about how cool and awesome a Cool Sword is. It still seems borderline judging by the context which is why I'm asking for confirmation.
Gushing in general isn't really something we want off of Sugar Wiki, regardless of the details.
A little gushing in tropes that are about how great something is probably can't be avoided, though it should be minimized. But when it's about someone's clothes, especially undergarments, it's pushing the No Lewdness line.
edited 3rd Jun '12 9:24:17 PM by HersheleOstropoler
And I don't need to know about folks going no panty shots of a ten year old? awwww. I shall snip the CCS example.
Yay, other people who are helping. People who are actually morally offended (Some of this stuff does creep me out too, but not as much as it should. I tend to err on the side of being too lenient in case you haven't noticed. My mindset is more "Is this professional sounding?" than "Is this morally objectionable?". Although even I was a bit squicked by how much content the Dawn example had.)
I tried to clean it of natter and too much detail.
Is that your whole sentence?
edited 3rd Jun '12 8:13:24 PM by animeg3282
My grammar-fu is off today, I guess. It's my whole sentence of rambling.
Anyways, thanks for the help. I'll give it one more look over in case you missed anything.
Thanks. I'm not morally offended, but there are some things that man was not meant to know.
In any case, I removed some NSFW links. It should be clean now, but just in case, I'm watchlisting it. I'll probably give it another proofreading sometime tomorrow afternoon unless another request for cleaning comes in. You can never be too careful.
I'm seeing some one hell of a lot of straight-up porn examples on Fetish Retardant. Probably needs a cleaning.
edited 8th Jun '12 10:28:51 AM by Iaculus
I only saw a few that didn't qualify for the trope and cleaned those up, but I'll double check.
By the way, that page was hilarious. I needed a good laugh.
Can anyone familiar with Anita Blake tell me if I need to flag it? The entry on it under Fetish Retardant seems problematic. It fits the trope well and I think I cleaned the entry sufficiently, but if the Shota sex scene is too explicit, then the work doesn't fit the new content policy.
edited 8th Jun '12 11:14:43 AM by encrypted12345
Thought we weren't accepting entries from porn works any more, though? Because there's a fair few hentai doujins and the like on that page.
Yeah, I deleted those on the double check.
Huh, forgot a couple. Editing right now.
Miss World 96 Nude is still up in jury.
edited 8th Jun '12 11:30:15 AM by encrypted12345
Anite Blake has a magic vagina! What should we do? Hhaha. I'd ask on the thread, folks.
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?