The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
I'll send Dragon Ranger to the cutlist now.
I've checked the Related examples on a couple entries, chopped a handful (mostly examples retelling the torture details of that Fairy Tail fic), and threw the entries into fully-done.
That pedofurry comic has a ton of examples that I'd like to review for pornyness later on so please nobody "done" it.
Alright, I've been checking the second episode of Angel's 3Piece!, and in the first part it was clarified the part of the innuendo by saying they want him to touch their instrument, but then, it seems like an objectionable part came like 5:45 minutes into the episode. And now it seems like it's having some skeevy thoughts about her little sister, and that character even lampshaded it. I think that's going to be a turn-off and a clear red flag.
There were innuendos here and there, and even... ugh... skeevy suits in the little girls... and panties in the tsundere girl... isn't that even more of a red flag already? I dunno.
I only checked the chapter in a quick pace, so maybe someone else can confirm or deny what I said?
edited 17th Jul '17 3:57:43 PM by Lightmaster
I was wondering where to break out the Tenshi no 5P joke.
Only skimmed through said episode - thank you, Bile Fascination - but will concur with the above poster's assessment. Formal review will be required at some point soon. 2 episodes might be a bit premature to draw definitive conclusions (as an aside, when was the last time P5 reviewed an ongoing work?) but given what's been seen so far, it's definitely concerning and unless the trend abates soon, it's going to go into full-on paedopandering territory. (I'm being too nice here, tbh - the only thing that keeps it out of "definitely paedopandering" territory is the possibility of Early-Installment Weirdness / sampling error.)
For historical context on some recent points raised, although I'm not in a position to speak for P5 / site admins at this point in time:
- Formal licensing by a mainstream distributor to the Western market, while an initial consideration as far as legality is concerned, does not necessarily guarantee a pass by site standards.
- I was the one who reviewed the Chu-Bra manga back when we were first starting out. You can see the arguments for and against it if you refer to the linked posts in one of the sticky threads, but in the end it boiled down to 1.) 12-year-olds and 2.) Too many inappropriate artistic choices e.g. half-page panty shots.
- Creator's gender is not a major consideration in the evaluation of a work: for example, the author of Kodomo no Jikan is a woman.
- Requests to review a decision can be made. I don't think specific rules have been set in stone, but it's usually accepted that requests for re-evaluation should only be made if additional new information is being brought to the table (e.g. censored releases), or if a work was not properly evaluated prior to cutting (e.g. before P5 was formally established).
edited 17th Jul '17 9:27:01 PM by Pyrite
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.I'm not 100% clear on how this place works, but I'm looking at the bizarro fiction page and there's a lot of stuff there that I think is objectionable in a way that might/should interest the admins.
I'm thinking of two in particular: Holey Matrimony (its page makes it sound like it's either pure porn or Excuse Plot porn) and—sigh—The Vagina Ass of Lucifer Niggerbastard, which needless to say is full of explicit sexual content and uncensored racial epithets. There's also something called The Ass Goblins of Auschwitz that describes children's corpses being turned into sex dolls.
(Also, if there's a mechanism for flagging pages from the page itself, I couldn't find it. I think this is my first time reporting something.)
By the looks of the sheer amount of events and the described shortness of the book, it is going to be just lame point-list rather than getting down into nitty gritty descriptions. Really dulls the impact, ya know.
Same goes for the assgoblins, it sounds like just shoving shock-content with minimal dedicated effort.
edited 18th Jul '17 12:21:51 AM by Adannor
Feeling emboldened by the fact that, however strange my request may be it can't possibly top The Vagina Ass Of Lucifer Niggerbastard or The Ass Goblins of Auschwitz, I want to revisit my post from the last page
and get an okay to make a page for Omujo! Omutsu Joshi. Content wise, it's relatively tame, I don't think it even really tops High School D×D, mentioned a bit later, but a harem series where the harem's girls all wear diapers is so potentially flaggable I wanted to get an Okay (or at least "not a no") ahead of time.
I made a sandbox for it to see how a proper page might look. I admit the premise is a lot more prevalent than I realized at first, so I can see why a no may come up. If I get a no, I'll cut the sandbox, no harm no foul.
edited 18th Jul '17 6:57:16 AM by sgamer82
Alright, looking over the petition to restore the Baldr Sky's page, as well as a look into the work itself, and I'm voting Angelhead. While I do wish there was a clean version ala Fate or the other visual novels we have up, as is, the sex scenes seem to be a minority in the work itself. The character designs definitely run into that aesthetic where the ages can be hard to judge, but as is I'm going to say that the debated characters do look like young adults. Though I agree with the restoration's ideas on making sure the page doesn't attract people chatting about their fetishes.
How do we restore the page? Bring it up here?
You can ask here, but I don't see an item in the to-do CVR
about Baldr Sky...


Is there a reason why all the cut items on the completed CVR
which have already been cut are still in the queue?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman